20 Dec 14
Elevator ~ I am not a hypocrite. The posts that you copied were sent in irony. Admittedly a difficult idiom to purvey via message
I was v 'interested' in BBs pics(in a manly kind of way) I accept that I was duped by her copying from porn sites, and thank the watchful members who pointed that out to me.
Can we just ignore this other person?
20 Dec 14
'better' is possibly not the right word ~ 'more wholesome' may be a clumsy way of describing it
Can I say here that I only saw what I perceive to be BBs 'soft porn' shots (top out, no front bottom)
all seemed innocent enough to me. I have since descended into 25 hrs of a cesspit. I am crawling out (sorry for hyperbole, but do YOU post on here every day??) (How??)
- Joined
- 04 Aug 09
- Moves
- 37163
20 Dec 14
Originally posted by st dominics previewI certainly do NOT.
'better' is possibly not the right word ~ 'more wholesome' may be a clumsy way of describing it
Can I say here that I only saw what I perceive to be BBs 'soft porn' shots (top out, no front bottom)
I have since descended into 25 hrs of a cesspit. I am crawling out (sorry for hyperbole, but do YOU post on here every day??) (How??)
20 Dec 14
Originally posted by Great Big SteesAll I have ever learned about animal tracks, which isn't much, is from an old Beano comic (or was it Looney Tunes) where one of the characters tied a tree branch (with leaves) to his waist and trailed it behind him to cover his tracks. Only now, looking back, do I realise that, far from making him untrackable, there would be several telltale furrows covering a much wider area than his tracks would. Reading can be dangerous!
I have a couple of books on animal tracks but haven't any on photo tracks. I may head to a photo shop or library tomorrow and see if I can find one.