Originally posted by Very RustyI know something even more pathetic: people who bleat on about going to the site moderators, but have neither the honesty nor the courage to go through with it.
This only irritates me slightly....
Poster(s) that stir the pot, I'll go so far as to say instigate, then when things don't go their way go crying to the site moderators about the injustice being done to them.
Though, to be honest(!), that's not irritating, that's merely yawn-inducing.
Richard
14 Jun 12
The post that was quoted here has been removedTim, you seem to be suffering from some rare strain of 'big pond' selective amnesia'. Let's not let the fact that a few pages back your original question received my reply get lost in the workaday week shuffle:
13 Jun '12 10:17
Originally posted by catfoodtim
"Ha! Despots and tyrants and, erm, cauliflower irritate you?
Can you give me an example of a village, country or kingdom that has got what it deserved (please) ?"
_________________
"Yes, I could give you many examples in both contemporary and historical times. Why, though, would I insult your above average
intelligence in public by doing so. Perhaps your Mum, Bride or a school teacher/friend might deign to do so privately."
_____________________
Now, Sir Tim, you insist that we go all around the same barn again. You're making it abundantly clear that you're entitled to some form of veteran perks or prilvileged status but, nonetheless, even you must bring something to the Red Hot Pawm General Forum table other than your gluteus maximus. So kindly tell us all about the helpful information your family may have already provided to augment your own knowledge. Then, of course I will gladly comment further, elaborate on countries and principalities with policies which militate against human independence, collective liberty and individual freedom. Other posters may also be motivated to join in. You will, however be unable to play ball conversationally with any of us as long as your motive is ulterior or your agenda is driven by an inordinate need for social approval.
Hope you're able to come home to your senses sooner rather than later, so that this active thread can get on with its business. Thanks in advance for cooperating. -gb
.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAssuming people eat pies, yet again??
[b]Persons: People who eat with their pie holes open. Places: Near home and abroad which exaggerate their vacation venues. Things: Cheap starchy bread, white sugar and sandpaper tp.
.[/b]
Exaggerated vacation venues?? What's that all about? Does it deceive you of your immobility to get out to the park, pushed by maid Vera Lynn and not Anthony? We don't all live in a nursing home, Bob!
As for your basic agenda of simpleton nouns, we can all comment about things Bob. Commenting wasn't the direction Sir Tim was looking for. Just a simple, plain, truthed answer was beckoned.
Yet again, you missed it. You missed the opportunity to spell 'I was so correct!'
As for, and against, all the negatives you obviously wanted somebody to fall for - I HAVE NO DOUBT you will be giving a smirk remark, yet again, to something you completely missed in your open pie, and your water with leadened bread, we hopes. 🙁
-m. 😀
The post that was quoted here has been removedI doubt you'll get this kind of history in another 3 or 4 life times Sir Tim...... dementia is ubiquitous in this dimension........ never before recorded in all humanity.
I preferred to use 'ubiquitous' as opposed to irrational because:
------------------
This paradigm is also described as pervasive computing, ambient intelligence,[2] or, more recently, everyware,[3] where each term emphasizes slightly different aspects. When primarily concerning the objects involved, it is also physical computing, the Internet of Things, haptic computing,[4] and things that think. Rather than propose a single definition for ubiquitous computing and for these related terms, a taxonomy of properties for ubiquitous computing has been proposed, from which different kinds or flavors of ubiquitous systems and applications can be described.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubiquitous_computing
-------------------
I can surf too Bobby. I certainly don't like sharks though, do you?
😉
-m. 😴
Edit : Jesus, did you write that Wiki excerpt Bobby? It's very similar to your style of abmiguity.... 😕
😉
14 Jun 12
Originally posted by HandyAndyGiven some thought to your question in the past (in recent months especially, being privileged to witness both old and young in the throes of losing or already having lost their
Which orifice do you prefer, Bobby?
faculties and senses). If I had to forfeit one, it'd probaly be hearing rather than sight, taste, touch, ambulation due to paralysis or amputation, perception and rational thought.
.
14 Jun 12
Originally posted by mikelomAppreciate your insights as always.
Assuming people eat pies, yet again??
Exaggerated vacation venues?? What's that all about? Does it deceive you of your immobility to get out to the park, pushed by maid Vera Lynn and not Anthony? We don't all live in a nursing home, Bob!
As for your basic agenda of simpleton nouns, we can all comment about things Bob. Commenting wasn't the direction Si ...[text shortened]... pletely missed in your open pie, and your water with leadened bread, we hopes. 🙁
-m. 😀
.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyPay attention, Bobby. Which orifice do you prefer for eating?
Given some thought to your question in the past (in recent months especially, being privileged to witness both old and young in the throes of losing or already having lost their
faculties and senses). If I had to forfeit one, it'd probaly be hearing rather than sight, taste, touch, ambulation due to paralysis or amputation, perception and rational thought.
.
.