Originally posted by st00p1dfac3So, wouldn't that make you wonder if Patrick was as smart as you say he is?
Actually, Pat's smarter than he seems... See, he's askin' me all the questions via PM first - then he's checkin' my answers with the more intelligent general public. It ain't my fault he don't take my word for it - but, seriously, would you?
Originally posted by rbmorrisYou took the words right out of my mouth...
The Net NAT can provide support for servers in the private network that need to be "seen" from the public network.
Fixed mode is the equivalent of plain RFC 1631 conversion. In this mode, a table defines a fixed relationship between apparent and actual addresses. No translation of port number is performed in this mode, since that isn't required.
Originally posted by shortcircuitChrist almighty. Buy a sense of humour. If you were half as smart as you like to pretend, you wouldn't be spouting off about your failed marriage and whatnot in publicly accessible arenas. If you had half as much of a job as you claim to, you'd have enough money to buy friends, so you can't afford to be a dick.
So, wouldn't that make you wonder if Patrick was as smart as you say he is?
Patrick's not that bad - he's got some questions, doesn't find real people's opinions on Google. He may have the wrong site, but he's only asking. He asks here to get a realistic answer - give him a break.
I've given him another site with forums that deal with the questions he has which is pretty good, so you may all settle down now. He's not 7ate9/Gascraft for crying out loud.
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Get off of your indignant stump there. You think you have me figured out? You mean I am not smart because I speak of a failed marriage? I got news for you chief, a failed marriage does not mean someone isn't smart. Secondly, my job is as I said, I have plenty of money, and only an idiot would think they could buy friends with money. I don't have to bribe anyone to be friends. Friendships occur, but they damn sure aren't bought. If you haven't learned that by now, then you need to get a grip on life and re-evaluate. I am not sure you have noticed, but I am not the only person who is fed up with Patrick's posts. He is inviting the responses he gets because of his presentation. You two are obviously buddies, so why don't you enlighten him? That's what friends do.
Christ almighty. Buy a sense of humour. If you were half as smart as you like to pretend, you wouldn't be spouting off about your failed marriage and whatnot in publicly accessible arenas. If you had half as much of a job as you claim to, you'd have enough money to buy friends, so you can't afford to be a dick.
Patrick's not that bad - he's got som ty good, so you may all settle down now. He's not 7ate9/Gascraft for crying out loud.
Originally posted by shortcircuitI didn't say you were unintelligent - I said you were a screaming desperate loser for sharing the intimate details of your life on an internet forum. I am not buddies with anyone. Not here - not anywhere else. I am a leader of men, not a joiner of cliques, or a follower of those who would display circus-performer charisma. Since you seem to enjoy (beyond most others) giving the underdog a hard time, you are the smallest of men. I doubt very much that anything you've told us is true... If it was, you wouldn't have the time or interest in that last post to respond...
Get off of your indignant stump there. You think you have me figured out? You mean I am not smart because I speak of a failed marriage? I got news for you chief, a failed marriage does not mean someone isn't smart. Secondly, my job is as I said, I have plenty of money, and only an idiot would think they could buy friends with money. I don't have to brib ...[text shortened]... n. You two are obviously buddies, so why don't you enlighten him? That's what friends do.
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Leaders of men do not look down upon others. They encourage their followers to rise up stronger than they were the last time.
I didn't say you were unintelligent - I said you were a screaming desperate loser for sharing the intimate details of your life on an internet forum. I am not buddies with anyone. Not here - not anywhere else. I am a leader of men, not a joiner of cliques, or a follower of those who would display circus-performer charisma. Since you seem to en ...[text shortened]... is true... If it was, you wouldn't have the time or interest in that last post to respond...
"Why do you say 'Brother you have a speck in your eye' when you fail to notice the beam in your own eye? Remove ye first the beam from thine own eye. Then you shall see clearly to help remove the speck from your brother's eye."
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Are you among the smallest of men? I am lashing back at you.
I didn't say you were unintelligent - I said you were a screaming desperate loser for sharing the intimate details of your life on an internet forum. I am not buddies with anyone. Not here - not anywhere else. I am a leader of men, not a joiner of cliques, or a follower of those who would display circus-performer charisma. Since you seem to en ...[text shortened]... is true... If it was, you wouldn't have the time or interest in that last post to respond...
I am also curious to see a leader of men who has no friends. I am a leader of men as well, but I have many friends (and many who are not my friends).
You have deemed Patrick as an underdog, but then you admit you don't know him at all, but you think he is intelligent. Interesting observations. How do you know this? Are you clarvoyent too?
You think that only losers post in forums? You mean you are afraid to speak your mind in a forum? Do you only lie when you speak in forums to hide the real truth away? Seems contradictory.
You have shown your own ignorance by your posts. You are perpetually contradicting yourself. Are you so embarrassed by your life that you feel the need to create this power fantasy of yours?
Funny thing is, I don't have to prove squat to you, nor do I really give a rat's ass what you think. You became judge and jury when you attacked me. I am only shoving your crap back at you. Enjoy!
Originally posted by shortcircuitI am among the fattest of men.
Are you among the smallest of men? I am lashing back at you.
I am also curious to see a leader of men who has no friends. I am a leader of men as well, but I have many friends (and many who are not my friends).
You have deemed Patrick as an underdog, but then you admit you don't know him at all, but you think he is intelligent. Interesting observ ...[text shortened]... u became judge and jury when you attacked me. I am only shoving your crap back at you. Enjoy!
I have no friends by my definition of friends - I have loads of friends by most people's definition (ie - people I hang out with, talk to, have common interests with.)
I never claimed intelligence for anyone - I merely claimed your assault on his character and intelligence prove that you are an insecure little person, possibly with small equipment.
I also never said that only losers post in the forums - I said you were a loser.
I have no fantasy - in groups, I am the leader, or I am the "I'm walking away because this isn't working" type. That isn't a fantasy, that's the way things work. With the exception of friendly meetings, random conversations, etc. At work, you either listen, or listen. There isn't another option.
I attacked you, after you attacked someone else - so who's trying to prove something by jumping on a bandwagon, and who's doing what they think? Take your crap and stick it.
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
I am among the fattest of men.
I have no friends by my definition of friends - I have loads of friends by most people's definition (ie - people I hang out with, talk to, have common interests with.)
I never claimed intelligence for anyone - I merely claimed your assault on his character and intelligence prove that you are an insecure little person, ...[text shortened]... jumping on a bandwagon, and who's doing what they think? Take your crap and stick it.