01 Mar 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyPlease comment on the OP "1) What is your own personal overall assessment of Red Hot Pawn's online correspondence chess game and public forum functions and features? 2) Which of these do you enjoy and benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments?"
Well written........
Now, how about commenting on the OP "1) What is your own personal overall assessment of Red Hot Pawn's online correspondence chess game and public forum functions and features? 2) Which of these do you enjoy and benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments?"
01 Mar 16
Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason"Thanks. Hope Russ reads it."
Please comment on the OP "1) What is your own personal overall assessment of Red Hot Pawn's online correspondence chess game and public forum functions and features? 2) Which of these do you enjoy and benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments?"
Originally posted by HandyAndy"Questions: 1) What is your own personal overall assessment of Red Hot Pawn's online correspondence chess game and public forum functions and features? 2) Which of these do you enjoy and benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments? Thanks." (OP)
Bobby can't resist telling Russ how to run his business.
______________
This topic of this thread is neither @HandyAndy nor @Grampy-Bobby.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyBut they don't know that Bob. They think the topic is always about them, and the only way for them to feel good about themselves is to insult and ridicule others.
"Questions: 1) What is your own personal overall assessment of Red Hot Pawn's online correspondence chess game and public forum functions and features? 2) Which of these do you enjoy and benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments? Thanks." (OP)
______________
This topic of this thread is neither @HandyAndy nor @Grampy-Bobby.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyRHP is a small enterprise in the big scheme of things and therefore the owners and shareholders (if any) will be more interested in maintaining reliable revenue streams rather than gaining nebulous "market share". Perhaps you would be better serving Russ by promoting the site and generating more subscriptions within your local community, or perhaps by starting a blog; which has been suggested to you on many occasions.
Red Hot Pawn will be able to continue its presence on the worldwide internet
as a viable online correspondence chess site with public forums.
Besides, market share of what? Online chess? online gaming generally? The market is so fragmented that referring to market share is only really meaningful on a macro level.