Go back
5-piece mate

5-piece mate

Only Chess

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
18 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

(honestly boys posting a fen is pretty easy.) 😉


Perfect. A six piece mate.
(sounds a lot better than a 4 piece and two pawn mate.)

I knew one of the lads would come up with something like this.
You have never let me down in the past. Excellent.

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
Forget about the OP position for a bit. In your position, is Bc6 involved in the mate?
I answered that question already. 😏

patrickrutgers
Pale Yellow Star!

Minneapolis

Joined
29 Sep 08
Moves
38345
Clock
19 Sep 12

Originally posted by SwissGambit

Pawns:
[fen]8/8/8/2P1kPP1/4PP2/3PP3/8/7K w - - 0 1[/fen]
Wow! A zero piece mate!

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

I have a game that's a 7-piece mate if we allow redundancies, but really a 5-piece mate if we omit the needless wQ and Ph2 or f2.

Game 7507220


A nice 5-er [not counting Pf7]

Game 7415663

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by patrickrutgers
Wow! A zero piece mate!
I think you got it now, matey. 😀

tvochess

Joined
08 Apr 09
Moves
20026
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey SG,

i was looking for mates with one single piece-type, but with as many essential pieces as possible. Your rook set-up is good, but I think the queen set-up could be like a bishop set-up with maximum 5 essential pieces.



I'm not sure the position can be reached legally..

Your pawn set-up made me realize that an essential 9-piece (well yeah: pawn) checkmate positions is possible.



None of these pawns can be removed! It's obviously an illegal position by the way, because there are only 8 white pawns in a regular game.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

I suppose tvochess's eight knights could be modified slightly to make it eight knights and a pawn, with each square around the king (and the square the king stands on) attacked only once:

tvochess

Joined
08 Apr 09
Moves
20026
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

That is another one: all essential 9-piece mates have a pawn checking the king.

I initially forgot the pawn, but afterwards I realized it's the only piece that can check the king without attacking any of the squares surrounding the king. Chess is beautiful.

Bebop5

Milwaukee, WI

Joined
11 Dec 10
Moves
16731
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

How about this one? 5-piece mate and in under 20 moves.Game 9470625

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tvochess
Hey SG,

i was looking for mates with one single piece-type, but with as many essential pieces as possible. Your rook set-up is good, but I think the queen set-up could be like a bishop set-up with maximum 5 essential pieces.

[fen] 8/1k6/8/8/8/5B1B/7B/5BB1 [/fen]

I'm not sure the position can be reached legally..

Your pawn set-up made me realize ...[text shortened]... iously an illegal position by the way, because there are only 8 white pawns in a regular game.

This position is legal - white's last move was Bd1-f3# or some such. Before that, bK wandered along the long diagonal while the other Bishops took their places.

In your 2nd diagram, we can replace a pawn with a King to make it legal.

tvochess

Joined
08 Apr 09
Moves
20026
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
[fen] 8/1k6/8/8/8/5B1B/7B/K4BB1 [/fen]
This position is legal - white's last move was Bd1-f3# or some such. Before that, bK wandered along the long diagonal while the other Bishops took their places.

In your 2nd diagram, we can replace a pawn with a King to make it legal.
[fen]8/2K5/8/4kPP1/2P2PP1/2P2PP1/8/8 b - - 0 1[/fen]
Hey SG,

adding the king helps, but there is another problem: the mating pawn move couldn't have occured, because the square it came from is occupied by another pawn. So at least the f4-pawn has to be replaced by a d4-pawn. Then, the last move was d3-d4# (or d2-d4# ).



Number of legal essential 9-piece checkmate patterns with only king and pawns (relative to defending king square) = 4*1*2*2 = 16

Starting from the original 9-pawn mate set-up:
- the king should replace 1 of the 4 pawns covering the corner squares. Replacing other pawns makes other pawns redundant or is illegal. So the king could be on c7, g7, c3 or g3.
- the c and g pawns (or replaced by a king) are fixed. These cover d and f files, which if covered with e-pawns would lead to redundancy.
- there are 2 possibilities for the mating pawn (covering e5), i.e. d4 and f4 --> this dictates the position of the pawn covering e4 (so 2 combinations d4+f3 and d3+f4)
- there are 2 independent possibilites for the pawn covering e6 (d5+f5)

I'm just wasting time.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
19 Sep 12

Originally posted by tvochess
... but there is another problem: the mating pawn move couldn't have occured, because the square it came from is occupied by another pawn.

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tvochess
Hey SG,

adding the king helps, but there is another problem: the mating pawn move couldn't have occured, because the square it came from is occupied by another pawn.
It came from e3, as Fat Lady just pointed out. 🙂

tvochess

Joined
08 Apr 09
Moves
20026
Clock
19 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Of course! I always forget these capturing moves in backward problems.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.