Go back
Am I the only one who loves the French?

Am I the only one who loves the French?

Only Chess

DTG

Joined
07 Apr 10
Moves
8856
Clock
26 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
I'm still mad there's no American defense, gambit, or anything.
Chess was invented by George Washington, so all systems are eventually creditided to America.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
26 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't like the French much, I tend to get cramped when I play it.

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
26 Jun 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

There is a Brazilian player called George Washington.

Here is one of his games.

George is White: Crossing the Delaware

E

Joined
05 Jun 11
Moves
521
Clock
27 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cabandmush
I hate playing white against the French Defence, because the Winawer just leads to such chaotic positions and I end up with no idea what is going on. I've got a couple of games going right now with the Winawer and in not one of them have I got the faintest clue whether I'm better or worse.

Any tips for playing White against the Winawer would be appreciated. Such as - what the hell is going on!
I feel the same way about the Winnawer! I never have any idea who has the
advantage, and any plan I manage to conjure up seems to fall to pieces immediately.
People go on and on about how the Sicilian is the sharpest of all openings, but I feel
more lost against the Winnawer. Often times I don't even know the right place to
put/leave my king. I like playing against it though, anything that puts me out of
my comfort zone has got to be a good thing.

Haven't played the French much as black, sticking with the open games for now...

t

bedlam

Joined
20 Feb 11
Moves
6387
Clock
27 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought the whole idea of the winawer is that nobody knows exactly what's going on.
It's why books use 'chances for both sides' 'unclear' 'dynamic equality'.

Don't despair,just play chess 🙂

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
27 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Fischer states of it that its anti positional (i suppose this is the giving up of the dark squared bishop for the c3 knight, blacks , 'good bishop'.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
27 Jun 11
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moon1969
Some say that 3.Nc3 is the ultimate refutation of the French, but as white I now like playing against the French with 3.Nd2.
I also like this idea, after 3.Nc3 black gets a good game with the Winnawer, this line
can be a little more 'tricky', if black doesn't know what he's about, although, saying
that, with the best moves, black can give up the exchange for control of the centre,
reaching this position.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
27 Jun 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I also like this idea, after 3.Nc3 black gets a good game with the Winnawer, this line
can be a little more 'tricky', if black doesn't know what he's about, although, saying
that, with the best moves, black can give up the exchange for control of the centre,
reaching this position.

[pgn] [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] suggests 0-0. The rhp game continued 0-0. I dont know who i prefer.}[/pgn]
Nice comments. I agree. 3.Nd2 avoids the Winnawer and the pin, and black is less likely familiar with 3.Nd2. In regard to the game you posted, I generally do 9.exf6.

I haven't necessarily given up on 3.Nc3 but still going with 3.Nd2 for now.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
27 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moon1969
Nice comments. I agree. 3.Nd2 avoids the Winnawer and the pin, and black is less likely familiar with 3.Nd2. In regard to the game you posted, I generally do 9.exf6.

I haven't necessarily given up on 3.Nc3 but still going with 3.Nd2 for now.
mmm, although i am a simple peasant farmer, does not 9.exf6 help black to develop? do you like the ultra aggressive Nf4?

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
27 Jun 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I have 21 games with this line on RHP.
White wins = 9 Draws = 4 Black wins = 8

As is often the case on here the the opening stats hide
the fact that a fair number of the games are decided by
a tactical blunder in levelish positions.

Gatecrasher - Quirine RHP 2006
Tactical blunder by White leading to on the spot resignation.




Intermezzo - daromott RHP 2008
Tactical blunder by Black leading to on the spot resignation.



Sicilian Smaug - Quirine RHP 2009
This entertaining game features a common theme in this variation.
The exchange v the Black central pawn mass.

Here the Rooks get active and rule though it comes down to a pawn race.
White has all the chances due to the exposed Black King.
Black places the King and Queen on the same rank, White spotted the shot.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
27 Jun 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
I have 21 games with this line on RHP.
White wins = 9 Draws = 4 Black wins = 8

As is often the case on here the the opening stats hide
the fact that a fair number of the games are decided by
a tactical blunder in levelish positions.

[b]Gatecrasher - Quirine
RHP 2006
Tactical blunder by White leading to on the spot resignation.

[pgn]
...[text shortened]... xf4 {Alert play. Also 42.Rxd4+ with the same skewer works.} 42..exf4 43.Rxd4+ Kb5 44.Rb8+ [/pgn][/b]
yes its very interesting GP, i had seen the Quirine games, but these were the only ones i could find. What can we say? if its difficult for black to play then, its difficult for white also, Will whites rooks prevail or will blacks centre. Zeigler states that it was Bronstein who sad that he 'sacks the exchange for control of the centre', cant be bad!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.