Originally posted by cheater1Actually a good choice, your first of course is a uncommon.
AH, a legit, albeit OFF TOPIC question, from Greenpawn. I ALWAYS respond to legitimacy. Here is my top 5 list of Chess players, I don't follow anyone else.
5. Josh Waitzkin. As much as I like to BASH him for all his shortcomings and failures, I admire his blitzkrieg attacking style, his easy to understand lessons, and his previous overall devotion to che ...[text shortened]... ng chess. I prefer to play engine vs engine matches and fine tune my chess program CANNIBAL 37.
Perhaps you should started a new thread.
Greenpawn, I must make an observation of you. From when I first burst on the scene here, you have followed me closely but NEVER once added anything other than questions. "WHY?" seems to be a common question with you. Sometimes I even respond to your boring questions and then you find some fault with the answer.
I must now make a GUESS as to the general populace of this site. Please correct me if I am wrong. Once again, this is just a guesstimate of the people here based on my experiences here.
I deduced that the average age of the users here is between 12 and 20. The average OTB rating would probably be about 1500, rank beginner. Most people know one another and stick up for one another and HATE outsiders. XENOPHOBIA. THere is an abundant amount of jealousy of me, mixed with hatred. No one likes the know-it-all. It has been shown that my reputaion precedes me as EVERYONE knows my history at the other site. Heck me vs 1000 and WINNING is no small task. It's like in high school, when the new girl is twice as pretty and talented than the other clique of pretty talented girls and she gets all the attention from the jocks, then the other girls make her life a living hell....well that's how I feel, and I'm not even a girl.
Sorry to rain on your parade, but there's a new, smarter, better looking, chess authority in town. That would be ME. Ridicule me all you want, it's what you all do best. I'll continue to be the better man. I'll continue to address things that need to be addressed. I'll continue to post my scholarly editorials. I'll continue to back up my findings with DOCUMENTED facts. I'll continue to cite my sources and post my links. I'll continue to act in a civil manner.
On the other hand, you all can continue to troll and flame and spam and be offensive in MY topics. You all can continue to be substanceless. You all can continue to gang up on me out of jealousy. It's what you do.
I popped in to see what the attraction was with this troll thread. The spamming definitely improved it.
And to greenpawn, Recuvic, robbie, et al, Please STAY OFF TOPIC!!!
cheater1 regurgitates from the other site becaue he's being environmentally friendly. More regurgitated crap = less thinking = fewer calories burned = less carbon dioxide exhaled = smaller carbon footprint.
Re cheater1's top pick of Waitzkin, I just have one comment: "No, that's not quite right." (This will sound familiar to anyone who's listened to Josh's CM tutorial.)
Surely there must be a Far better and more Useful site with more Clever and intelligent Kids where your Own Fine greatness will be Forever more appreciated than here. We are not worthy of you. Perhaps we should be left alone to wallow in the depths of our ignorance.
GO and find this new site as it can't be far AWAY. Don't waste time with just any old IDIOT.
And DON'T worry about us... for COME the day we need you BACK to help us, we will find you and ask most graciously.
MAD ROOK, READ MY TOP 5 AGAIN.
You know how you just cant get mad at a 3 year old when they knock over a vase and break it, I just cant get mad at you because you EPITOMIZE everyone here, the proverbial 3 year old that just talks to hear themselves talk. I made it PLAIN AS DAY that waitzkin was #5. Heck, I even put a number 5 in front of it. Top pick is #1. That means top pick. A One. The numeral 1. 1 means best. 5 means fifth place. 5,4,3,2,1. Where one is best, 2 is second, 3 is third, 4 is fourth, 5 is fifth. 5 does NOT equal top pick. 1. Best. Fischer. 5. Waitzkin.
And so it is with everyone here. JUST LOOKING FOR AN ARGUMENT!!!!!
Originally posted by cheater1You put Josh as no. 5, but I know that you were just putting out disinformation. You really think he's no. 1. I know you better than you know yourself, you can't fool me.
MAD ROOK, READ MY TOP 5 AGAIN.
You know how you just cant get mad at a 3 year old when they knock over a vase and break it, I just cant get mad at you because you EPITOMIZE everyone here, the proverbial 3 year old that just talks to hear themselves talk. I made it PLAIN AS DAY that waitzkin was #5. Heck, I even put a number 5 in front of it. Top pick is ...[text shortened]... est. Fischer. 5. Waitzkin.
And so it is with everyone here. JUST LOOKING FOR AN ARGUMENT!!!!!
And I'm not 3 years old! I'm NOT, I'm NOT, I'm NOT!!!!! 😛
Edit - And where is the new Chandler Cornered column for this week? I need my CC fix!!!
Originally posted by cheater1Typically, I don't post directly at other users and insult them...but you seem to have pushed me....
Greenpawn, I must make an observation of you. From when I first burst on the scene here, you have followed me closely but NEVER once added anything other than questions. "WHY?" seems to be a common question with you. Sometimes I even respond to your boring questions and then you find some fault with the answer.
I must now make a GUESS as to the general anceless. You all can continue to gang up on me out of jealousy. It's what you do.
hmmmm....I don't see the situation as a hot new babe on campus and the guys giving her attention....I see you you as the ugly fat chick that even the most disgusting of guys wouldn't touch even if paid.
And finally, when the ugly cow starts bawling in the middle of the lunch room, screaming "You hate me because I'm pretty" it is the job of everyone, even the previous "ugliest" girl to put her in her place....
In summary...
You suck, your wrong, you flame others you stupid ignorant troll
Originally posted by c guy1rec'd
Typically, I don't post directly at other users and insult them...but you seem to have pushed me....
hmmmm....I don't see the situation as a hot new babe on campus and the guys giving her attention....I see you you as the ugly fat chick that even the most disgusting of guys wouldn't touch even if paid.
And finally, when the ugly cow starts bawling in ...[text shortened]... e....
In summary...
You suck, your wrong, you flame others you stupid ignorant troll
I asked to attend on a Tues/Wed and met with the club President and two prominent club players/members[1991-August] who names I did not note in my journal ,and was warmly shown around the club room. It was a little surprising to me to find that the actual playing room was merely what looked liked a room in a private house/home.Almost as though everything else had simply been built around it!-I have not found in my games list retained Colonel WGIF gamesgames but will send any that still exist and may be of some interest? I had thought it was the top 10 players and not five to select,seems even I can be wrong ,on ocassion!??😀
Originally posted by cheater1Your statement is logical is it? OK, lets break it down to see.
Once again, based on logic, common sense, history, and FACT, I make a statement that is ridiculed for no other reason than to ridicule it.
I just don't get it with you people.
1. Americans are lazy.
2. Americans have a sense of entitlement.
3. Young Americans are not smart.
4. Americans place more emphasis on being good athletes than they do on being intelligent.
Therefore, there will never be an American world chess champion.
This argument is invalid. Even if 1 through 4 were all 100% undeniably true, the conclusion is not guaranteed.