Originally posted by tonytiger41hmm...
karpov losing game after game at the donostia tournament in spain.
chess has evolved greatly over the last ten years
Same squares, same pieces....
same principles...
new deeper memorizations.
Whats changed? Whats evolved?
Peoples willingness to follow principles several hundred years old?
The ideas were always there. We're just beginning to see how right
we always were.
-GIN
Originally posted by Nowakowskifor one, it's a no-brainer to get very strong opponents to play against, within seconds. that's bound to broaden the GM-level considerably.
Whats changed? Whats evolved?
the other thing, karpov probably hasn't really trained for a decade or two. no matter how strong base he has, he must've lost the best sharpness. I doubt his age itself has much to do with it.
Originally posted by Nowakowskithe chess evolution is clearly due to the influence of computer-like tactics and database study.
hmm...
Same squares, same pieces....
same principles...
new deeper memorizations.
Whats changed? Whats evolved?
Peoples willingness to follow principles several hundred years old?
The ideas were always there. We're just beginning to see how right
we always were.
-GIN
if you don't detect the evolution, it is likely you do not remember the dark ages before computers became good.
we use to spend hours working out complex positions, but now we can observe fritz churn out and work out so much in mere minutes. this method of study claerly influence the style of the new generation of top chess players.
Originally posted by NowakowskiI imagine all active GMs spend many hours every day just to stay current and maintain their form. If you stop doing it for years, there is no way you can compete. The same is true in all sports.
and the same principles of learning, teaching, and growth still apply.
The game really hasn't changed that much.
-GIN