Originally posted by Ari Brenin CymruI think that there has been some misunderstanding of the aims of the QGA in some of the discussion. In any of the main lines (3.Nf3, 2.e4, 3.e3) it is bad for black to try to hold the pawn. However, by playing 3.Nc3 (a very rare move) you are playing a move that allows black to hold the pawn with ...a6 and ...b5. If White plays a4 to prevent this, he only allows an annoying pin on his knight and weakens his queenside. Anyone who plays the QGA at a high level would love to see Nc3 and a4 from White. If you don't want Black to hold his pawn, then one of the main lines seems to be the best choice.
In certain QGA games I end up in a situation like this:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Nc3 .
When black tries to hold on to the pawn by advancing a6 and b5 I cannot seem to capitalize on this, I've read that trying to keep hold of the pawn creates big problems for black. What should I play to gain an advantage in these type of situations?
Scott
Originally posted by MarinkatombYes, that was the decisive mistake as far as I can tell. But, I don't have to capture the bishop until black moves the a pawn, so if black does move the bishop I get a little extra time to do something else. Also the position after that isn't bad for me, the kingside pawn majority gives me reasonable chances there, balanced by my opponent's better pawns on the queenside. He abandoned the Albin Counter Gambit after this game and now plays the Leningrad Dutch, and regularly beats me with it otb, which is annoying as I introduced him to the opening 😞.
Black can play 20.Bb6 21.cxb6 ..bxc6 with repaired pawn structure...