Go back
Colle-Zukertort

Colle-Zukertort

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mipmcpt
Why not????????????????

I think its a excelent openning?system.
Fair enough.....each to their own!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mipmcpt
also polgar has done a dvd on this variation!!!

I Like it a lot and play it frequently!!
Also, in the May 2006 issue of Chess Life, GM Susan Polgar's column discussed this opening in detail. The article was 4 pages long (which is twice as long as most of her columns) and discussed many variations within this opening. Anybody considering playing the Colle-Zuckertort [ECO D05] will almost certainly find the ideas presented in the article useful. Although I do not own the DVD, I would assume it covers the opening in even greater depth than the article.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have the dvd,well worth buying. Its easy to understand and she puts the ideas over well!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

If you want the newest word on the Zukertort, you might wish to check out www.zukertort.com

-Z

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The main problem of Colle for white is that black can equalise easily after 1.d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5! (instead of 3...e6).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
The main problem of Colle for white is that black can equalise easily after 1.d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5! (instead of 3...e6).
I then like 4.Bd3, if 4...Bxd3 then you have 5. cxd3 and a strong pawn center and a fun open c-file to use. if he doesn't play it, then he has to move his bishop, or defend, which wastes tempo

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by c guy1
I then like 4.Bd3, if 4...Bxd3 then you have 5. cxd3 and a strong pawn center and a fun open c-file to use. if he doesn't play it, then he has to move his bishop, or defend, which wastes tempo
As I have already written in Thread 90913 :

4...e6 is good of course, but in my opinion also 4...Bxd3 is playable - after 5.cxd3 white will have three pawns in center but this center is not too useful for offense as moving e pawn too far (or exchanging it) white doubled pawns d3 and d4 may become weak.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RabbitCold
Which do you think would give me more fighting chances: the Colle Zukertort or the London System. I am also thinking about playing the bishops opening if I decide to play e4 instead of d4 first.
1.d4 2.c4

THAT will give you more fighting chances. I agree with CMSmaster

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
The main problem of Colle for white is that black can equalise easily after 1.d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5! (instead of 3...e6).
After 3...Bf5, White should probably transpose into a Queen's Gambit with 4 c4 and play aggressively on the Queenside while trying to exploit the absence of the QB from that sector of the board.

If instead of 4 c4, White plays 4 Bd3, Soltis recommends 4...e6, as 5 Bxf5 exf5 will make it virtually impossible for White to expand in the center for quite some time.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
After 3...Bf5, White should probably transpose into a Queen's Gambit with 4 c4 and play aggressively on the Queenside while trying to exploit the absence of the QB from that sector of the board.

If instead of 4 c4, White plays 4 Bd3, Soltis recommends 4...e6, as 5 Bxf5 exf5 will make it virtually impossible for White to expand in the center for quite some time.
After 1.d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5 4.c4 c6 it will transpose to Slav defence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Actually one of the ways to avoid 3...Bf5 is transposing into Colle after 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.e3 d5. Here is example from my own practice.

[Event "Rated game, 90m + 5s"]
[Site "Room 1"]
[Date "2008.06.10"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Korch"]
[Black "Totaler_hirntot"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D05"]
[WhiteElo "2120"]
[BlackElo "1980"]
[PlyCount "77"]
[EventDate "2008.06.10"]
[TimeControl "5400+5"]

1. d4 {22} e6 {24} 2. Nf3 {13} Nf6 {25} 3. e3 {35} d5 {42} 4. Bd3 {3} c5 {65}
5. c3 {6} Nc6 {43} 6. Nbd2 {44} Be7 {167} 7. O-O {123} O-O {24} 8. dxc5 {13}
Bxc5 {19} 9. e4 {4} h6 {209} 10. Qe2 {176} Qc7 {141} 11. Bc2 {48} Bd7 {369} 12.
h3 {187} dxe4 {26} 13. Nxe4 {9} Nxe4 {21} 14. Qxe4 {0} f5 {7} 15. Qe2 {220} Bd6
{235} 16. Be3 {234} Rad8 {220} 17. Rad1 {3} e5 {184} 18. Qc4+ {165} Kh8 {59}
19. Qh4 {7} f4 {135} 20. Bc1 {40} Bf5 {298} 21. Bxf5 {537} Rxf5 {7} 22. Qg4 {1}
Qf7 {316} 23. Nh4 {56} Rg5 {14} 24. Qe2 {7} Qxa2 {374} 25. Qe4 {211} Qf7 {67}
26. Rd5 {123} Bc7 {267} 27. Rfd1 {61} Rxd5 {99} 28. Rxd5 {3} Rh5 {27} 29. Nf3 {
15} Rf5 {16} 30. b4 {76} a6 {21} 31. b5 {72} axb5 {5} 32. Rxb5 {2} Qd7 {
Totaler_hirntot bietet Remis 349} 33. Rxb7 {97} Rf7 {8} 34. Bd2 {291} Re7 {35}
35. c4 {227} Nd4 {301} 36. Nxe5 {34} Rxe5 {35} 37. Qxe5 {6} Ne6 {286} 38. Qd5 {
79} Qa4 {63} 39. Qxe6 {Totaler_hirntot gibt auf (Lag: Av=0.31s, max=2.1s) 24}
1-0

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
After 1.d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 Bf5 4.c4 c6 it will transpose to Slav defence.
Yes, that is a very solid line. A bit more ambitious is 4...e6, and if White plays 5 Qb3, then Black plays 5...Nc6!. If White plays 6 Qxb7, then Black plays 6...Nb4!. After 7 Na3 (best) Rb8 8 Qxa7 Ra8 9 Qb7, Black can force a draw with 9...Rb8 or play for a strong attack with 9...Rxa3! 10 bxa3 Nc2+, etc.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
Yes, that is a very solid line. A bit more ambitious is 4...e6, and if White plays 5 Qb3, then Black plays 5...Nc6!. If White plays 6 Qxb7, then Black plays 6...Nb4!. After 7 Na3 (best) Rb8 8 Qxa7 Ra8 9 Qb7, Black can force a draw with 9...Rb8 or play for a strong attack with 9...Rxa3! 10 bxa3 Nc2+, etc.
After 4...e6 White should simply continue development with 5.Nc3 and I doubt if black has better option than to transpose into Slav with 5...c6

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.