Fantastic Winning by Topalov in game 9. Topalov...

Originally posted by 7ate9
Your opponent is kind. Wouldn't even take an easy win from you... or were you playing a sacrific there?

uhhh what.....?

Originally posted by 7ate9
It looks like FL was talking about the entire tournament so far, and you were talking of a single game.

yeah thats a possiblity, but i believe the thread is regarding game 9, so i assume he is talking about game 9, maybe i shouldnt have....

Originally posted by 7ate9
At present the world chess championships are in progress. The biggest event on the chess calender, till chess becomes an olympic sport. So yeah, it's only natural that interest will be found here through the grapevipe. It's also natural that some people would like to check out these forums first before deceiding IF they would like to join.

You could be right, or you could be wrong....

Look at LA's profile and note his comment in one forum post .....

Originally posted by LA I am not going to waste time showing you how little you know about chess.

also note that he has nearly 6 pages of posts but 0, zero moves. Now who would know so much about chess that he would not show someone how little they know about chess, but has made zero moves here? Even if the forum would attract interest during the world championship, most decent newbies would have a few games and post in the forums. None of them would machine gun the forum with posts while telling regular users here that they know so little about chess.

Look under my profile for the hospitality abused thread and tell me whether that guy still posts here like he used to, while having 0 moves.

Originally posted by z00t
Look at LA's profile and note his comment in one forum post .....

Originally posted by LA [b]I am not going to waste time showing you how little you know about chess.

also note that he has nearly 6 pages of posts but 0, zero moves. Now who would know so much about chess that he would not show someone how little they know about chess, but has ma ...[text shortened]... thread[/b] and tell me whether that guy still posts here like he used to, while having 0 moves.[/b]

although i agree with you on your post ... the topic of this thread remains .... topalov's win in game 9 - not the right of LA to post (even if he does seem like a one eyed jerk here to destroy our often meaningful discussion).

have you got a comment on topalov's win in game 9?

Originally posted by flexmore
although i agree with you on your post ... the topic of this thread remains .... topalov's win in game 9 - not the right of LA to post (even if he does seem like a one eyed jerk here to destroy our often meaningful discussion).

have you got a comment on topalov's win in game 9?

I do not feed trolls, noting the number of world-championship/topalov/kramnik threads in progress. There should not be more than 1 or two. What are we going to have next round another post on game 10?

Feeding trolls is as bad as sitting down on the negotiating table with terrorists.

Originally posted by z00t
I do not feed trolls, noting the number of world-championship/topalov/kramnik threads in progress. There should not be more than 1 or two. What are we going to have next round another post on game 10?

[b]Feeding trolls is as bad as sitting down on the negotiating table with terrorists.[/b]

yes - game 10 of the chess championships deserves its own thread - why not!

disentangle the game from the rest of the political and other rubbish - lets have a good look at game 10 for what it is!

Originally posted by z00t
Look at LA's profile and note his comment in one forum post .....

Originally posted by LA [b]I am not going to waste time showing you how little you know about chess.

also note that he has nearly 6 pages of posts but 0, zero moves. Now who would know so much about chess that he would not show someone how little they know about chess, but has ma ...[text shortened]... thread[/b] and tell me whether that guy still posts here like he used to, while having 0 moves.[/b]

Wow



May I say:

Why would a chess player play with another one if his rating is at least 300 points above his opponent's?

Originally posted by Los Angeles
Wow



May I say:

Why would a chess player play with another one if his rating is at least 300 points above his opponent's?

Any decent chess player would play somebody 300 below them so that the other player may learn from them. After all, aren't we all here to enjoy and improve our chess?

Originally posted by Sidi
Any decent chess player would play somebody 300 below them so that the other player may learn from them. After all, aren't we all here to enjoy and improve our chess?

Agree with you,

I wold like to play with one that I like though.😉

Why would I play for example with somebody who has no respect to the truth?

Originally posted by Los Angeles
Agree with you,

I wold like to play with one that I like though.😉

Why would I play for example with somebody who has no respect to the truth?

Why not beat a 2000 on here to settle the issue? That should be simple enough for a player of your calibre I think. Then next time you make a comment on Kramnik/Topalov games, or any other chess principles etc, at least it carries some weight? You have to understand us mere apprentices. We want so much to learn more from the experts like yourself, but first you have to show us what you've got. I think it's not an unreasonable request?