Only Chess
29 Jun 06
Originally posted by leisurelyslothBut wouldn't 4. exf7 be exf7+, requiring Kxf? How about:
is it something like
1.e4 a5
2.e5 Nc6
3.e6 Nb8
4.exf7 Nc6
5.fxg8=B Nb8
6.Ba6 bxa6
7.Bc4 Nc6
8.Bf1 Nb8
1. e4 a5
2. e5 f6
3. exf Kf7
4. Ba6 Kg6
5. f7 bxB
6. fxN=B Kf6
7. Bc4 Kf7 puts K into check! Arg!
8. Bf1 Ke8
I can do it a couple of different ways in 9 moves, but not in 8!
This beautiful problem reminds me of a book by Raymond Smullyan, "The chess mysteries of Sherlock Holmes". I haven't seen it mentioned before on RHP. In it the great detective solves several mysteries using what he calls "retrograde analysis". Here's a fairly easy example:
"As you see, Watson, neither side is mated-not even in check. And we are given that your side is White. The question now is this: Given that Black moved last, what was his last move, and White's last move?"
Even Watson gets it fairly quickly. Other problems are trickier.