"Apparently it is possible to negotiate the result of a game.
It's called a draw.
And in some cases could be considered a "gift".
Game 1398758"
I suggest you study that endgame deeply if you think that is a clear cut loss for me simply because I'm down material. Yes, I offered a draw there, it was the safe route at the time (at the time I played him he was 1750 and that was one of the first games I started), he accepted, maybe because he felt unsafe about the position too, I mean, look at my pawns. There was no negociation or discussion before and during the game. I offered a draw, he accepted. In another similar like unclear drawish looking game, I offered a draw, he declined, and we are still playing.
Originally posted by UmalakasGame 1398758
"Apparently it is possible to negotiate the result of a game.
It's called a draw.
And in some cases could be considered a "gift".
Game 1398758"
I suggest you study that endgame deeply if you think that is a clear cut loss for me simply because I'm down material. Yes, I offered a draw there, it was the safe route at the time (at the time I p ...[text shortened]... ilar like unclear drawish looking game, I offered a draw, he declined, and we are still playing.
Why didn't he promote his pawn, some people are idiots.
Originally posted by Bad wolfVery true.
Game 1398758
Why didn't he promote his pawn, some people are idiots.
For your information, whites play from the bottom of the screen.
D
Originally posted by UmalakasTell you what. You have evidence I cheated, you take it up with Russ. Otherwise, shut your fat piehole. Got it?
You do know, that negociating results before and during the game, and creating these in the said game is considered a clear violation of chess rules? Although it's not written directly in the TOS. It's a common practice/rule known to all chess players, like say en passant, or how the peices move. You simply cannot negociate results or politicalize the gam ...[text shortened]... If she's leaving, she should JUST LEAVE, not give players she likes "gifts" before she goes.
Originally posted by Checkmate187Does anybody believe this crap??? The game is a 21 day timeout/ 21 day timebank; plenty of time for such a great player to figure out how to overcome the terrible disadvantage of having doubled pawns in the opening! What's more you assured your pawns would be doubled by playing 1 .... Na6 and then 10 moves later decided it was sooooooooo bad that you needed to force a perpetual by a combination? BS!! Why don't you tell us the real reason why those moves were played, Checkmate??
It was a tournament game, and a draw is worth 1 point.
I didn't like my position or my pawn structure. I saw the opportunity to give perpetual check, and with over 100 concurrent games running I decided to take the draw instead of going into a drawn out slug fest with an inferior position.
I would have continued had it not been a tournament game.
Originally posted by no1marauderThat is a very good call-out.
Does anybody believe this crap??? The game is a 21 day timeout/ 21 day timebank; plenty of time for such a great player to figure out how to overcome the terrible disadvantage of having doubled pawns in the opening! What's more you assured your pawns would be doubled by playing 1 .... Na6 and then 10 moves later decided it was sooooooooo bad that you ne ...[text shortened]... ombination? BS!! Why don't you tell us the real reason why those moves were played, Checkmate??
skeeter