Originally posted by 7ate9Yes, that's what I mean. You occupy d5 with a piece. Then support it with other pieces. No white pawns can attack d5, therefore the g2 bishop's range would be shortened. If white decides to trade away his g2 bishop, then he'll have light square weakness around his king.
I don't know if it's that good cause the g2 bishop, and the defending pawn gets separated from the pack?
Originally posted by ckoh1965The light square weakness doesn't seem such a big deal, because Topalov positioned his light-squared bishop to trade it for Nb5. It doesn't seem like he's going to attack with it or something.
Yes, that's what I mean. You occupy d5 with a piece. Then support it with other pieces. No white pawns can attack d5, therefore the g2 bishop's range would be shortened. If white decides to trade away his g2 bishop, then he'll have light square weakness around his king.
Originally posted by ilywrinDoesn't it lead to the same? Nd7 Bxb5 axb5 Rf7 Nxb6 Rxa7 Nxd5. Exactly the same position, except for the exchange on b5, which makes no difference. It all leads to a won game for white.
Maybe what Topalov has in mind is: Nd7 Bxb5!? axb5 Rf7...It's getting really messy 😉