Go back
Good Chess Books

Good Chess Books

Only Chess

P

Joined
09 Apr 02
Moves
18607
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Considering I have a rating of around 1350, can anyone advise me a good chess book?

S

Joined
07 Feb 03
Moves
1058
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pawnpower
Considering I have a rating of around 1350, can anyone advise me a good chess book?
Get a generic book on openings, choose a solid opening and play it to death. And get a book on the end game, the middle game comes with experience 🙂

M

Joined
30 May 05
Moves
2444
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

m

Joined
25 Sep 04
Moves
1779
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

"The Search for Chess Perfection" by C.J.S. Purdy.

b

Hainesport, NJ, USA

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
17527
Clock
30 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Try out Famous Game of Chess-playe by Arthur Saul. Although a little dated (published 1614), it gives great advice to intermediate players as well as showing different kinds of mate, including stalemate, scholar's mate, and fool's mate. The wood cuts are nice too!

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
31 Jul 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Serendipity
Get a generic book on openings, choose a solid opening and play it to death. And get a book on the end game, the middle game comes with experience 🙂
Forget studying openings if you're under 1600. Get a book with tactics exercises and one on elementary endgames.

While considering tactics, don't overlook checkmate patterns. If you can read descriptive notation (the old English and American style), then Renaud and Kahn, The Art of the Checkmate is excellent. Murray Chandler, How to Beat Your Dad at Chess, which is not just for kids, offers a lighter approach (less instructive in my opinion) to some of the same checkmate patterns. You can also find a digest of these two, and a couple others, organized in a useful way at http://www.angelfire.com/poetry/wulebgr/checklist.htm.

If you ignore all sound advice and opt for studying openings, then get Reuben Fine's classic, The Ideas Behind the Chess Openings.

s

Joined
13 May 03
Moves
6536
Clock
01 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

'Rapid Chess improvement' by de la Maza is a controversial book which states that you should only study tactics until you reach quite a high level of play. I think he has a point.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
01 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stoffer
'Rapid Chess improvement' by de la Maza is a controversial book which states that you should only study tactics until you reach quite a high level of play. I think he has a point.
His point might carry more weight if he still played chess.

A

Joined
12 Jul 04
Moves
3836
Clock
02 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pawnpower
Considering I have a rating of around 1350, can anyone advise me a good chess book?
Get a book on tactics first. I would go for "The ultimate chess puzzle book" by GM John Emms. This will keep you busy for a long, long time and I am sure that you will have lots of pleasure solving them all... If you continue to be in love with chess get:

A book with anotated games! I can't think of a better one than: Zurich International Chess Tournament, 1953 by David Bronstein (Paperback). With these two you will be able to learn a lot and become proficient in the middlegame and opening ideas.

For the endgame Fundamental Chess Endings (Paperback) by Karsten Muller, Frank Lamprecht will more than sufice for your needs (I am not exaggerating, I believe that's the only endgames book any chess player would ever need...

D

Joined
31 Jul 05
Moves
419
Clock
03 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pawnpower
Considering I have a rating of around 1350, can anyone advise me a good chess book?
-"Winning Chess Tactics -Yasser Seirawin"

-Buy a chess engine, and do their endgame studies

---------------

That should shoot you up to about 1500, how to improve from there? I honestly haven't found a quick way to do it, people say to study positional chess, but that seems to be overated at that lvl.

D

Joined
31 Jul 05
Moves
419
Clock
03 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh yeah, and study some classical bishop sacrefices that lead to kingside attacks, I am somewhat of a specialist at this, and it has surprised a lot of people, but eventually people catch on and say, "watch out for this guy sacreficing bishops", and it doesn't work so well anymore, but you could use it as a surprise weapon to beat the higher rated players in your club a few times.

j

Kuala Lumpur

Joined
05 Aug 05
Moves
908
Clock
06 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

For online chess tactics

Checkout this site

http://www.chesstactics.org/

Cheers

z

Joined
23 May 04
Moves
5800
Clock
06 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
...The Art of the Checkmate is excellent.
This book has been very valuable to me. It divides checkmate patterns into 12 groups, making them easier to study and recognize. I think this book has been one of the most valuable I have. I will keep studying this book until I have these patterns memorized.

Please give it a look.

Good luck.

L

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
7902
Clock
06 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I would recommend essential chess endings by james howell. I am currently reading it and it is the best chess book I have read so far.

buffalobill
Major Bone

On yer tail ...

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16686
Clock
06 Aug 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pawnpower
Considering I have a rating of around 1350, can anyone advise me a good chess book?
Go to the library, take out and study any books they have on chess tactics. Understand the tactical side of chess before bothering with anything else. Learn positional play and then get hold of some of Yasser Seirawan's books which are so simply written even I can read them. That way you can begin to understand why your opponents move the pieces the way they do. Understand the logic of the moves that are made and only then can you start learning the various phases of the game, like openings, endgames etc.
For the record, I may be reasonably rated, but I regularly get thrashed by anyone over 1900 because they've got better positional sense and I've still got a lot to learn.
Look at the games you've lost, see how you've been squeezed, learn from them - that's usually positional play. Why did he put a piece in a position that you found hampering your position three moves later? What moves did you make that you later found to be fatally weak? Get to the logic behind the moves of the opponents you lost to and what mistakes you made. Mistakes (as opposed to blunders) are not immediately apparent - you feel the effects later.
The beauty of a site like this is you get to play many times more games than you ever could hope to play over the board (OTB). Play often and use it as a learning experience. If I'd had this opportunity as a kid in the early '70s when we'd play a game a week in the league, I'd be a better player today (maybe).
Play lots, study tactics and look at your mistakes, is my first recommendation. But only if you look at tactics can you understand your mistakes.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.