Go back
How good is

How good is "good"?

Only Chess

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moteutsch
The reason I think I'll be able to achieve this is because it is very important for me to do this, and I have the time necessary to dedicate to this goal.
Some people devote years to chess and never achieve an expert rating.

m

Joined
29 May 08
Moves
10250
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
Some people devote years to chess and never achieve an expert rating.
I have also been improving rather quickly recently. But to tell you the truth, we could argue about this all day and never agree on anything. We'll just have to wait and see...

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moteutsch
I have also been improving rather quickly recently. But to tell you the truth, we could argue about this all day and never agree on anything. We'll just have to wait and see...
Well, just because your rating has gone up recently doesn't mean you have consistently improved. It only means that you have made a jump in skill and now your rating is catching up. You may very well achieve your goal but the point people are trying to make is for you not to be disappointed if and when you do not.

m

Joined
29 May 08
Moves
10250
Clock
24 Sep 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
Well, just because your rating has gone up recently doesn't mean you have consistently improved. It only means that you have made a jump in skill and now your rating is catching up. You may very well achieve your goal but the point people are trying to make is for you not to be disappointed if and when you do not.
I hope that was an "or" or at least an "and/or".

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

5. Be3 in the french really isn't that bad. GreenPaladin, an appropriate 6th move is Qd2! Remember that 99% of chess moves have good sides and bad sides, I believe the good outweights the bad with this move.

While the move is certainly limiting to the scope of the bishop, in combination with Qd2, it solves nicely all of whites problems. b2 is covered, Bd3 can be played and Bxf5 if black plays a knight out there. This is also one of the few lines in the french advance which allows white the time to play f4 guaranteeing white long term spatial advantage even if black plays f6.

Green Paladin

Pale Blue Dot

Joined
22 Jul 07
Moves
21637
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
5. Be3 in the french really isn't that bad. GreenPaladin, an appropriate 6th move is Qd2! Remember that 99% of chess moves have good sides and bad sides, I believe the good outweights the bad with this move.

While the move is certainly limiting to the scope of the bishop, in combination with Qd2, it solves nicely all of whites problems. b2 is covered, Bd3 ...[text shortened]... hite the time to play f4 guaranteeing white long term spatial advantage even if black plays f6.
Yes, you're right. I thought there was an obvious tactical refutation but Qd2 solves all of White's problems.

m

Joined
29 May 08
Moves
10250
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Also, when I say "Expert" I mean barely just an Expert (2000).

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
24 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moteutsch
Also, when I say "Expert" I mean barely just an Expert (2000).
My statement above was and if statement. I will not say you cannot do it because this would be a faulty statement since of course it is possible. I only want to warn you not to give up on chess if you don't make it... That is what happens to most when they find they can't realize their chess goals.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Green Paladin
Yes, you're right. I thought there was an obvious tactical refutation but Qd2 solves all of White's problems.
Just to expound a little more, I think that there are two downsides to the move.

1. The bishop becomes a glorified pawn for quite a while.
2. It doesn't make much sense (to me) to play this unless you intend to play f4 in response to f6, but there are masters games where dxc5 is played. The downside to f4 is that it allows black to play Nh3-f5/g4 when White has to decide if he should play Bd3 and perhaps Bxf5.

a

Joined
08 Oct 06
Moves
24000
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

You have to be at least 2650 OTB to be good. Everything else is pathetically weak.

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
You have to be at least 2650 OTB to be good. Everything else is pathetically weak.
That's not true. There are probably people out there who love the game of chess and are strong enough to have a 2650 fide rating but quit playing before they got there for some odd reason... The point is that a bunch of numbers don't necessarily determine a players strength.

a

Joined
08 Oct 06
Moves
24000
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh, no no no. You have to BE 2650 to be good. If you're not 2650 OTB FIDE then you're not 2650 at all. So people like David Tebb are pure patzers!

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
Oh, no no no. You have to BE 2650 to be good. If you're not 2650 OTB FIDE then you're not 2650 at all. So people like David Tebb are pure patzers!
I'm sure that all the people who have 2649 rating are just sooo much weaker than those who have a 2650 rating.

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
25 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
You have to be at least 2650 OTB to be good. Everything else is pathetically weak.
How can you judge what is good if you are so bad?

a

Joined
08 Oct 06
Moves
24000
Clock
26 Sep 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

You don't have to be good to know what's good and what's not. For instance, Michael Jordan was good. He was 3063 ELO. Karl Malone, not so much. He was merely 2642.

If that explanation doesn't suffice, how about "a certain gambit told me so"?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.