Originally posted by GabrielHandsomeGab, I am curious about some of the equations you provide in the document, for instance on pg 186 you have eq # 5.40, downwash correction, Cl=2PI(ARc)/ARc+2, just curious as to the units and the symbols. A=surface area? R=radius of curvature? I don't see anything in the document that tells units or symbology. I have a major comment that could effect the performance of your system negatively if you wish to hear it.
I am Him!
Originally posted by GabrielIsAstonishingBTW Gab, in your game with Papie, you did 6 NxN. That is a well known loser which only simplifies black's defense so why would a player of your obvious ability play such a move?
Onyx, You going to play me? Im a noob so dont expect a great game, but i play for fun. so if u could play me out of the kindness of your heart id love u for it. literally
Well, I went to watch a movie, and when I came back online, it seems that Dr. Gabriel is no longer around. Supposedly, he violated some rules to be on here. I must say it's a relief now that he's gone. But just out of curiosity, the moderator of this website who kicked him out has done us all good, but isn't possible that he comes back under a different name? And again the whole cycle is repeated?
Originally posted by ckoh1965Quite possible. And I have a feeling that this was not his first visit to the site either.
Well, I went to watch a movie, and when I came back online, it seems that Dr. Gabriel is no longer around. Supposedly, he violated some rules to be on here. I must say it's a relief now that he's gone. But just out of curiosity, the moderator of this website who kicked him out has done us all good, but isn't possible that he comes back under a different name? And again the whole cycle is repeated?
Originally posted by exigentskyHIs IQ isn't 188! Gabriel Handsome read Bobby Fischer's intelligent quotient and decided he would take on Bobby's role and piss off the entire world. With that said, if Gabriel's IQ was 180+, we would have heard about him by now. My IQ is only 158, and I don't go around bragging about it. On another IQ test I scored 116 - the Harvard one. And, then on yet another I scored 124. Then the Stanford Binet, or whatever you call it, scores me at 158. You can't put much stock in IQ tests. I'm a creative mind, and it's a proven fact that people who are logically adept do much better on IQ tests and that IQ tests do not measure creative genius in the least.
While I don't put too much stock in IQ tests, an IQ of 188 is extremely rare (unless the median for the bell curve is not set to be 100). In fact, an IQ of 188 corresponds to roughly 1 in 50 MILLION.
Based on this rarity, your level of grammar, spelling, diction and general behavior; I remain incredulous. Please, don't tell lies.
I don't know why I'm editing this post so much, but I just thought of something else. If someone owns an abstract random personality (5% of personalities like I do) then they will be global learners. Global learners are highly intelligent, but usually are seen as under achievers because they do not use concrete means to solve problems or situations. They also say off the wall - even random things - when they really do not want to anger anyone. Much like I do on here. With that said, abstract random personalities are very sensitive and will not fair as well on a IQ test as would say a concrete systems personality would. Just a side note. This is in my area of expertise. I use to be a teacher. 🙂
Originally posted by powershakerYou don't go bragging about you IQ but yet you manage to trow it in somewhere, the highest test first of course. Then you go on to say that you personality type is one that doesn't normally fare well in IQ test, but is very intelligent none the less.
HIs IQ isn't 188! Gabriel Handsome read Bobby Fischer's intelligent quotient and decided he would take on Bobby's role and piss off the entire world. With that said, if Gabriel's IQ was 180+, we would have heard about him by now. My IQ is only 158, and I don't go around bragging about it. On another IQ test I scored 116 - the Harvard one. And, then ...[text shortened]... would. Just a side note. This is in my area of expertise. I use to be a teacher. 🙂