The post that was quoted here has been removedYour opinion of me and what I have posted is irrelevant to anyone but you, let it be
noted that you have FAILED to state
1. why the method of evaluating the opening that i posted was inaccurate
2. what GP said about any opening and its relevance to the discussion
3. why you are posting non chess related details in a chess ONLY forum
I have submitted your post for moderation, no one should have to listen to your foul
language during a chess discussion, if you are either unwilling, unable, will not or
cannot post anything related to chess, i suggest the general forum is that way, you
have contributed nothing to our understanding of chess except to demonstrate what
a truly unhappy and bitter individual you are, well that is fine, but please try to
understand your personal problems have no place here.
11 Feb 12
Robbie this:
"...for its well understood that he [greenpawn] hates openings.
You really don't know anything about me at all.
I love Opening Traps.
But as some lad posted earlier some, very few, opening books are OK.
The majority are trash.
I don't recall posting anything about openings in this thread or telling people
how to play. I was mainly against the pawn structure claim by Robbie that
it made calculating and spotting tactics easier.
Regarding the rest of the stick Robbie is getting, some of it is a bit off.
Although he can be stubborn sometimes....very rarely....once in a very blue moon.
He is right.
I saw that other thread on that other site.
"play colle system or just go 1. g3."
I can see I'm going to have join that shower and kick some butt. 🙂
Robbie you come along too.
I'll get them all het up and you can deny I posted it.
"Learning" opening theory isnt important until you reach 2000."
Now there is something along the lines of something I said in this thread.
Try not run before you can walk.
11 Feb 12
Originally posted by kbear1k"Folks do lose games to positional misunderstandings but most games are lost to tactics."
Ok - I'm back from a vey long week at work and decided to add my 2 cents to a very interesting conversation. Mind you that this is just my belief on the subject. Pawn structure in chess falls into the "strategic" bucket in the "strategy" vs. "tactics" debate. I think we can all agree with that. I think that strategy falls under "long range" planning when eva ...[text shortened]... ht I would add what I believe is an educated opinion on the subject.
Well said. Just today one of my 1800+ opponents blundered Rook in 1 move! (game is still in progress, but I expect him to resign).
Originally posted by greenpawn34yes sorry GP, perhaps i should have been more accurate with my statements, however
Robbie this:
"...for its well understood that he [greenpawn] hates openings.
You really don't know anything about me at all.
I love Opening Traps.
But as some lad posted earlier some, very few, opening books are OK.
The majority are trash.
I don't recall posting anything about openings in this thread or telling people
how to play. I wa ...[text shortened]... along the lines of something I said in this thread.
Try not run before you can walk.
your aversion to the majority of opening books is well known and publicized (i did
actually read the things that you were blogging in chessville etc)
As for the verbal abuse, its not a reflection of me, but of those who can find nothing
better to post and yes this was exactly my point, you posted nothing about openings
GP and the whole point of my initial post was to discourage learning opening theory and
to discourage memorising variations.
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 140841
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWrong again robbie baby, as the thumbs up show
Your opinion of me and what I have posted is irrelevant to anyone but you,
But I'll leave you alone with your delusional chess ideas. You have contributed exactly the same to this chess discussion as I have: zilc. I see GP likes to waste more time on you but I'll just slam this door in your face like I always do when your ilk is at my door.
Originally posted by KeggeI am sorry you have not answered any of these points, ill repeat them again,
Wrong again robbie baby, as the thumbs up show
But I'll leave you alone with your delusional chess ideas. You have contributed exactly the same to this chess discussion as I have: zilc. I see GP likes to waste more time on you but I'll just slam this door in your face like I always do when your ilk is at my door.
1. why the method of evaluating the opening that i posted was inaccurate
2. what GP said about any opening and its relevance to the discussion
3. why you are posting non chess related details in a chess ONLY forum
please i am uninterested in your personal problems, lack of civility, inability to communicate
anything other than hatred or cowardly practice of hiding behind the comfort of your pc to degrade
other people, but thanks anyway.
Originally posted by KeggeOops my bad Typo, Kegge interesting name that, we call Keggs pants as in underwear, just saying. Your post bears an uncanny resemblence to skeeters, she didnt talk much about chess either. You seem to be losing the thumb war Keggs, any ideas why?
Personal attack! Alerted. You are no better than I robbie. Get from your high seat.
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 140841
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAny response, either pro or con, tells us that your claim that nobody cares what I say is bollocks. That is exactly what I show ... your every post is bollocks.
Oops my bad Typo, Kegge interesting name that, we call Keggs pants as in underwear, just saying. Your post bears an uncanny resemblence to skeeters, she didnt talk much about chess either. You seem to be losing the thumb war Keggs, any ideas why?
For your info... Kegge is my real name, not something I made up like you did. I am who I am while you are an image. A very fade one as well.