Go back
If you think you are beaten. dont resign

If you think you are beaten. dont resign

Only Chess

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
Clock
14 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

That's true but most people at the higher level can prove it. You don't even need a great plan. If your a whole piece up, you can even just trade off stuff and go into a winning endgame.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
15 Jan 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by celticcountry
What strikes me as curious is, I am a 1200+ player and am optimistic but 2 replies are pessimistic and its from 1600+ players.

I didn't realise 1600+ was such a paranoid territory.
"Paranoid" isn't the right word. A player does not reach a higher rating by kidding himself. If you can't evaluate positions objectively, then you will not win against stronger players. You can have a world of belief in yourself, but as Bobby Fischer put it, "all that matters is good moves."

buffalobill
Major Bone

On yer tail ...

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16686
Clock
15 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
As Rahim as said, the higher the rating, the bigger the importance of being a piece down. If im a knight or bishop down AND have no opportunities to even the situation then thats it, im out! Resignation! Im not going to waste both mine and my opponents time by hoping for a blunder.
Correct. If your opponent shows he knows what he's doing and is not going to make a mistake, get out of there and stop wasting your time and energy. Get on with the ones you CAN win. He got in his position because he played better than you (assuming you did not blunder) and he's not going to stop doing so. I've resigned positions a pawn down when it was clear I could not stop him from Queening. Game 1389863
Or in a numerically dead even game Game 1293341
Heck, I've resigned a rook up, too Game 1389856
It's not about piece counting but evaluating the position and your possibilities. In all three cases, I had none.

c
Copyright ©2001-2006

Eastbourne

Joined
20 Sep 04
Moves
16434
Clock
15 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Correct. If your opponent shows he knows what he's doing and is not going to make a mistake, get out of there and stop wasting your time and energy. Get on with the ones you CAN win. He got in his position because he played better than you (assuming you did not blunder) and he's not going to stop doing so. I've resigned positions a pawn down when it was ...[text shortened]... ounting but evaluating the position and your possibilities. In all three cases, I had none.
i really believe you should not have resigned in two of them games.

I think you dont like endgames.

buffalobill
Major Bone

On yer tail ...

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16686
Clock
15 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by celticcountry
i really believe you should not have resigned in two of them games.

I think you dont like endgames.
I like endgames. Name the games and I'll show you why.

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
15 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Amaurote
No Name Maddox

County Doledrum

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
16156
Clock
15 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

It didn't work for John Major, and I don't think it'll work for the average player of chess.

G

Joined
15 Oct 04
Moves
1995
Clock
16 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
If you can't prove you've won, you really haven't.
prove that 1.e4 is better than 1.f3

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
16 Jan 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gambitzoid
prove that 1.e4 is better than 1.f3
exactly.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.