Go back
If you think you are beaten. dont resign

If you think you are beaten. dont resign

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

That's true but most people at the higher level can prove it. You don't even need a great plan. If your a whole piece up, you can even just trade off stuff and go into a winning endgame.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by celticcountry
What strikes me as curious is, I am a 1200+ player and am optimistic but 2 replies are pessimistic and its from 1600+ players.

I didn't realise 1600+ was such a paranoid territory.
"Paranoid" isn't the right word. A player does not reach a higher rating by kidding himself. If you can't evaluate positions objectively, then you will not win against stronger players. You can have a world of belief in yourself, but as Bobby Fischer put it, "all that matters is good moves."

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
As Rahim as said, the higher the rating, the bigger the importance of being a piece down. If im a knight or bishop down AND have no opportunities to even the situation then thats it, im out! Resignation! Im not going to waste both mine and my opponents time by hoping for a blunder.
Correct. If your opponent shows he knows what he's doing and is not going to make a mistake, get out of there and stop wasting your time and energy. Get on with the ones you CAN win. He got in his position because he played better than you (assuming you did not blunder) and he's not going to stop doing so. I've resigned positions a pawn down when it was clear I could not stop him from Queening. Game 1389863
Or in a numerically dead even game Game 1293341
Heck, I've resigned a rook up, too Game 1389856
It's not about piece counting but evaluating the position and your possibilities. In all three cases, I had none.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Correct. If your opponent shows he knows what he's doing and is not going to make a mistake, get out of there and stop wasting your time and energy. Get on with the ones you CAN win. He got in his position because he played better than you (assuming you did not blunder) and he's not going to stop doing so. I've resigned positions a pawn down when it was ...[text shortened]... ounting but evaluating the position and your possibilities. In all three cases, I had none.
i really believe you should not have resigned in two of them games.

I think you dont like endgames.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by celticcountry
i really believe you should not have resigned in two of them games.

I think you dont like endgames.
I like endgames. Name the games and I'll show you why.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

It didn't work for John Major, and I don't think it'll work for the average player of chess.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
If you can't prove you've won, you really haven't.
prove that 1.e4 is better than 1.f3

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gambitzoid
prove that 1.e4 is better than 1.f3
exactly.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.