is it likely to draw rook vs 2 rook

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Its against against the rules of fair play not to offer a draw if you only have 2 Rooks against a Rook, isn't it?

In the name of fun, the player with two rooks should sacrifice one of them.

Originally posted by Nordlys
In the name of fun, the player with two rooks should sacrifice one of them.

For the other players rook.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The side with 1 Rook should then make 50 pointless moves chasing the King about the board and then complain that the player with no Rooks who used to have 2 Rooks has not yet resigned.

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
The side with 1 Rook should then make 50 pointless moves chasing the King about the board and then complain that the player with no Rooks who used to have 2 Rooks has not yet resigned.

Well he did just chase a loophole. He should have been playing chess the right way by resigning!

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
No, I mean the sort of position where the 2 Rooks are disconnected and the weaker king is in a "bad" position.

For example, in this position with white to move he can check the king indefinately.

[fen]5R1K/3r4/4k3/8/8/6r1/8/8[/fen]

the thread asks if it's likely to happen, it's unlikely that that position would arise (if it does, then white should be hit in the head by a 2x4...or given an endgame book...)