08 Oct 07
Originally posted by HFRorbishow about the Ricter-Rorbis attack?
Yes it is 2..Nf6
ok but what is the theory after 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bf4 ?
and is 3 B.f4 Nc6 an opening ?
and besides, after
1. d4 d5
2. Nc3 c5!! is an easily won position for anyone with deep blue sitting in their basement (unless the game is on this site, apparently, Russ doesn't approve of computerized upgrades in our game-play)
09 Oct 07
Originally posted by rubberjaw30Please show us how this is "an easily won position". I don't see any serious problem with Black's position.
how about the Ricter-Rorbis attack?
and besides, after
1. d4 d5
2. Nc3 c5!! is an easily won position for anyone with deep blue sitting in their basement (unless the game is on this site, apparently, Russ doesn't approve of computerized upgrades in our game-play)
09 Oct 07
Originally posted by gaychessplayersarcasm was sposed to be apparent...
Please show us how this is "an easily won position". I don't see any serious problem with Black's position.
you know as well as I that, besides Fool's Mate, Scholar's mate and the like, games that are decisive after only the second move are few and far between.
Even 1. f3 2. Kf2 doesn't have a refutation (though black should win with good play)
10 Oct 07
1 edit
Originally posted by rubberjaw30Guess I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed on this thread, am I? 🙂
sarcasm was sposed to be apparent...
you know as well as I that, besides Fool's Mate, Scholar's mate and the like, games that are decisive after only the second move are few and far between.
Even 1. f3 2. Kf2 doesn't have a refutation (though black should win with good play)
I think that the teller at the IQ Bank shortchanged me! 🙁