If you're going to adopt the caro-kann, why not pick up the Slav as well? A lot of ideas in each are quite similar; and it'll help with transpositions, might even be able to avoid your opponent's opening preparation. Just my two candies.
Edit: Oh, and it'll save/economize your study time as well.
Can any of you offer reasons as to why (possibly) the French's popularity has gone way down since the turn of the century [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessopening?eco=C00] and the Caro-Kann's popularity has gone way up [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessopening?eco=B19]? Or, am I looking at this too simply? I ask this because, it seems--in general--more people here prefer the French to the Kann. Just curioius. I'm looking for a decent strategical system against 1.e4, so I'm trying them both out.
Originally posted by pinkthunderAfter e6 and d5, it is very difficult for Black to develop his Queen's Bishop when he plays the French. Also, the French requires a tremendous amount of book knowledge to play. Neither of these issues comes up when playing the Caro-Kann.
Can any of you offer reasons as to why (possibly) the French's popularity has gone way down since the turn of the century [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessopening?eco=C00] and the Caro-Kann's popularity has gone way up [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessopening?eco=B19]? Or, am I looking at this too simply? I ask this because, it seems--in general- ...[text shortened]... oius. I'm looking for a decent strategical system against 1.e4, so I'm trying them both out.
Originally posted by RahimKThanks. I can easily read the reviews at jeremysilman.com or wherever, but I always like to hear what others have to say about their experiences with certain book(s).
The starting out books are great. Not very detailed on one variation though.
I read starting out:the sicilian and loved it. My first opening book I read.