23 Jul 08
Originally posted by Zaibo9That might be a good one; I think I mentioned him as a cheater banned from here who was playing on another site. Might have ticked the poor boy off.
User 306509 Is my guess..
23 Jul 08
Thread 97461 Certain people are not only deluded, they're obsessed. I have nothing to do with some guy on Chess.com or Gameknot.
23 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by JieThe real question is, "Why do you care so much"?
Thread 97461 Certain people are not only deluded, they're obsessed. I have nothing to do with some guy on Chess.com or Gameknot.
Look, what is your agenda? What do you care? Are you protecting someone, hiding something?
A simple solution is this. If you don't care, don't waste your time in the few threads where cheats are discussed.
If you think there are no cheats here, you are sadly mistaken. If you don't care that cheats play, best you stay silent and play on... no one likes a guy plugging moves to impress the dim-witted, ignorant, or unwary.
P-
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitWho has appointed you ruler and judge? Its still a free country. If pointing out that the paranoid obsession has become of psychotic proportions is unacceptable to you, skip this post. As someone said you are unhappy with an obsession about your obsession. If you saw a chess player frothing at the mouth and speaking to himself in the chess hall, one would be concerned. You wouldn't, but a normal person would.
The real question is, "Why do you care so much"?
Look, what is your agenda? What do you care? Are you protecting someone, hiding something?
A simple solution is this. If you don't care, don't waste your time in the few threads where cheats are discussed.
If you think there are no cheats here, you are sadly mistaken. If you don't care that ch ...[text shortened]... . no one likes a guy plugging moves to impress the dim-witted, ignorant, or unwary.
P-
I did not say I did not think there are no cheats here, the reaction to alleged cheats is like McCarthyism to communism. Countless innocent American lives were destroyed due to the fear and paranoia.
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by JieI doubt that anyone's life will be destroyed by being accused of cheating on an internet chess site. If it were a GM who depends on chess for his living being accused on an official site then the effect could be damaging, but this site and the players here are none of those.
Who has appointed you ruler and judge? Its still a free country. If pointing out that the paranoid obsession has become of psychotic proportions is unacceptable to you, skip this post. As someone said you are unhappy with an obsession about your obsession. If you saw a chess player frothing at the mouth and speaking to himself in the chess hall, one would be con ...[text shortened]... sm to communism. Countless innocent American lives were destroyed due to the fear and paranoia.
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by JieNo one appointed me anything, just giving my opinion, or will you deny me that?
Who has appointed you ruler and judge? Its still a free country. If pointing out that the paranoid obsession has become of psychotic proportions is unacceptable to you, skip this post. As someone said you are unhappy with an obsession about your obsession. If you saw a chess player frothing at the mouth and speaking to himself in the chess hall, one would be con ...[text shortened]... sm to communism. Countless innocent American lives were destroyed due to the fear and paranoia.
As a side note, I hope your Internet dies so I can bid you Good riddance!
Your act is tired, you evidently have an agenda... or did you forget your first day on this site when you lied about everything you claimed to be?
P-
23 Jul 08
Its funny how you bade the guy who was leaving "good riddance" and called him a weakling yet his highest rank was 1500 whilst you are a 1200 patzer. I would not wish you leave the site but that u actually learned something and cut the pride and arrogance. I can mail you a chess book or two to break out of your situation. 😀
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by JieThere is a function called 'reply and quote'. Consider using it so people know who your insane banter is aimed towards.
Its funny how you bade the guy who was leaving [b]"good riddance" and called him a weakling yet his highest rank was 1500 whilst you are a 1200 patzer. I would not wish you leave the site but that u actually learned something and cut the pride and arrogance. I can mail you a chess book or two to break out of your situation. 😀[/b]
P-
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by JieJust out of curiosity, at the risk of sounding obsessed with cheaters, if you were in charge would you allow unannounced engine use? It sounds like you think there is nothing wrong with using a prog.
Does it mean people starting to play chess must be someone banned before? So Sergey Karjakin who beat Nigel Short for example must be Kasparov or Fischer reincarnated? I'm a weak player so it does not mean I will beat the top players here (or the top 1000).
I was reading the forum for a while and enjoy taking the cr@p out of big time charlies like No1Murderer so i joined.
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitAssuming you can do your math correctly, if you joined the site at 1200 and due to study of chess books gained 100 points each year, what would your rating be today?
There is a function called 'reply and quote'. Consider using it so people know who your insane banter is aimed towards.
P-
23 Jul 08
Originally posted by sonhouseNo I would not allow engine use but I would not allow witch-hunting and mindless cheater hunter trolling. Someone has told us that Chess.com use methods to catch cheats but do not allow cheating accusations to be made publicly. Does it mean because there is no cheat paranoia on other sites they welcome cheating?
Just out of curiosity, at the risk of sounding obsessed with cheaters, if you were in charge would you allow unannounced engine use? It sounds like you think there is nothing wrong with using a prog.