Go back
On Castling?

On Castling?

Only Chess

b

Joined
21 Jun 10
Moves
554
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm playing a rather good new player who has good vision but knows little Chess theory. I can't convince him to Castle. He can't see any value in it and wants to know why? It's been years since I've read a Chess book and I'm just getting back into it myself, this site is amazing! Anyone have something I could pass on to him?

r

Aberdeen, Scotland

Joined
15 Apr 08
Moves
5787
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

it generally gets your king safer, and your rook active. simple as that. of course there are exceptions.

Paul Leggett
Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
114051
Clock
22 Jul 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

First and foremost, see Greepawn34's thread on castling to deliver mate!

A rook in a corner only controls squares on the edge of the board. Castling is an efficient way of developing a rook, as it moves it closer to the center.

A king on e8 can be attacked from 180 degrees. A king on h8 can only be attacked from 90 degrees. Castling gets you there quicker.

Generally speaking, a castled position is far harder to attack than an uncastled position. Good players salivate when their opponent's king tarries in the center too long.

And to be blunt, hundreds of years of chess theory have evolved to show the value of castling, every world champion has done it with extreme regularity, and all the strong players do almost as a routine.

For a new player to think he knows better than these is arrogant stupidity -and I'm sure your friend is neither, but he should be warned about appearances. I speak from personal experience, as I was in his shoes once!

If he's winning every game against really strong players, and hasn't lost to anyone, then he can get away with wearing ignorance as a badge of bravery for a bit, but good competition will cure him quickly.

t

Joined
28 Mar 10
Moves
3807
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paul Leggett
but good competition will cure him quickly.
Paul's last sentence nails it.Kill his king in the middle over and over and then once more.He'll soon realise there might be some use in castling.

His results strengthen his believe.The way to go is to prove him wrong by results.
This can of course be difficult to do 🙂

toet.

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Karpov just before giving a simultaneous display in Scotland.

Q:"Do you have any strategy when giving a simultaneous display?"

Karpov: "First beat all those players who have not caslted then concentrate
on the rest."

But the only way for this lad to really learn is to get his uncastled
King mated 6 or 7 times. Then the penny will drop.

W

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
1968
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Of course while castling is generally recommended this isn't an absolute. Sometimes you should delay castling and develop/attack with other pieces. Sometimes your king is actually safer in the middle, and sometimes your rook is valuable on the h file.

b

Joined
21 Jun 10
Moves
554
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Wow!, Thanks for the immediate responses, I'm impressed!
I told my new playing buddy to read your posts and if these don't convince him.....

b

Joined
21 Jun 10
Moves
554
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Here's what he said:

"I read their posts. I think I might be looking at it incorrectly. Whereas I see fewer escape routes in case of attack.....they see fewer attack routes that would require attack".

And thanks again for the prompt responses.

Paul Leggett
Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
114051
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by beetlebomb
Here's what he said:

"I read their posts. I think I might be looking at it incorrectly. Whereas I see fewer escape routes in case of attack.....they see fewer attack routes that would require attack".

And thanks again for the prompt responses.
When I lose a game to him in the future, I'm blaming you, just so you know!😕

b

Joined
21 Jun 10
Moves
554
Clock
22 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Who would have ever thought we would/could be literally reading our opponent's thoughts as we play? Unbelievable!

g

Joined
20 Jul 10
Moves
1072
Clock
23 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

This thread is funny and so true. My younger brother says castling is for people who are scared, and when I am beating him, which is always, he says I play like the French.
I don't use the French defense and I am sure he doesn't know what the French defense is but he says that to me every game.
I have tried to tell him, and show him, the error in his ways but he thinks his way must be the best. He also said studying chess is cheating! 🙄

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
23 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gorookyourself
This thread is funny and so true. My younger brother says castling is for people who are scared, and when I am beating him, which is always, he says I play like the French.
I don't use the French defense and I am sure he doesn't know what the French defense is but he says that to me every game.
I have tried to tell him, and show him, the error in his ways but he thinks his way must be the best. He also said studying chess is cheating! 🙄
Castling is the only (legal) way you can move two pieces at one time.

g

Joined
20 Jul 10
Moves
1072
Clock
23 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
Castling is the only (legal) way you can move two pieces at one time.
e.p. En Passant?

g

Joined
20 Jul 10
Moves
1072
Clock
23 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

No. I am wrong. Sorry.

g

Joined
20 Jul 10
Moves
1072
Clock
23 Jul 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought e.p. En Passant and removing the piece would count as two moves.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.