Only Chess
30 Oct 12
01 Nov 12
Originally posted by greenpawn34Hi GP,
12..Ba6 is OK. I'm a classical player and rarely like to have one piece but doing
all the spade work. It's also trappy, I'd do it again.
I think the positon I got was OK for Black.
I simply missed White playing 18.Nc4 after my 17...Nxc1.
[fen]r3kb1r/p1p2pp1/b6p/4P3/3P4/NP1n1N2/P2K2PP/R1B3R1 b kq - 0 17[/fen]
It happens.
I did not lose any s ...[text shortened]... I can play
if for some reason I'm not in the mood. Especially after a tactical over sight.
no worries, my comment was for fun only 😛 I understand oversights happen quite often...
I should know I done plenty myself
The games I currently have underway seem to be doing ok, and I appear to be winning...
with one obvious exception lol
Originally posted by greenpawn34You have enough experience posting on here to know I meant 12...Nc2, that is 12...N-QB7 descriptive notation. You just wanted to give me another zing. Rating jealousy in action again.
Hi 64.
Looking at again.
[fen]r1b1kb1r/p1p2ppp/8/4P1N1/1n6/N7/PP1P1PPP/R1B1K2R b KQkq - 0 12[/fen]
12..Ba6 is OK. I'm a classical player and rarely like to have one piece but doing
all the spade work. It's also trappy, I'd do it again.
I think the positon I got was OK for Black.
I simply missed White playing 18.Nc4 after my 17...Nxc1.
[f n to anyone's contribution.
However if I want your opinion I'll plug in Fritz.
P.S. In case you are ignorant of chess descriptive notation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_notation
01 Nov 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI sometimes don't know what you are talking about RJ.
You have enough experience posting on here to know I meant 12...Nc2, that is 12...N-QB7 descriptive notation. You just wanted to give me another zing. Rating jealousy in action again.
P.S. In case you are ignorant of chess descriptive notation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_notation
A lot of non-posters read this Chess Forum, a lot.
With every game I sent a 'Good Luck'.
I've had about 10 back saying I don't need luck I'm going to use psychology. 🙂
(or words to that effect.)
01 Nov 12
Originally posted by RJHindsLOL
Rating jealousy in action again.
Seriously though RJ, he could destroy you in blitz. Hell, my Gran could destroy you in Blitz and I'm not sure she knows the rules of chess. There is no honor in box-enhanced ratings. GP's forum posts rate among the best there are. They're informative, educational, witty and even-handed. Take every antonym of these superlatives and they accurately describe your contribution here.
01 Nov 12
RJ, you have been proven to have used computer analysis in your games. There's no reason in the world anyone should be jealous of your rating. The best it can accomplish is pity. It's just painful to read the idiotic things that you write on this forum. And being scrupleless as your are, you write them everywhere so that no one can avoid your spew. I just want you to stop. Please.
01 Nov 12
Originally posted by morgskiI believe I have played 3 or 4 blitz games on here. The first one I had a wiining position, but did not play it right and ended up in a draw. I believe I won the other two or three. I'm not sure, I might have lost one. At the chess club I usually don't play bliz because I am not very good at it, but I have won before. But they want to play 5 or 3 minute blitz, which I think is luck chess.
LOL
Seriously though RJ, he could destroy you in blitz. Hell, my Gran could destroy you in Blitz and I'm not sure she knows the rules of chess. There is no honor in box-enhanced ratings. GP's forum posts rate among the best there are. They're informative, educational, witty and even-handed. Take every antonym of these superlatives and they accurately describe your contribution here.
