The post that was quoted here has been removedif that were true, there would be almost no one with ratings within 100 points . the ratings would seem random.
people with higher OTB ratings will tend to have higher CC ratings as well, because of pure chess skill. that is obvious.
whether this correlation can be quantified accurately...probably not 😕 unless we took a huge survey of all rated RHP players
thread idea!
ok ok i don't have an otb rating. theres never any tournaments close. the closest one is like 100 miles. anyways if you are looking to get a rating very close to your otb rating or trying to find out what your otb rating is. play very few games at a time. the reason is, set up the board at home and make your move on the board. also choose wisley when playing opponents. ok so someone is 1500 look at their graph and find out how strong of player they are. if they are playing all people higher than them or around their same rating and they are close to your rating. play them and see how you fare.
Originally posted by KeplerNon-linearities are the spice of life. Besides, who said anything about requiring linearity?
There may well be a correlation (it would be surprising if there were not) but the relationship between the two could well be non-linear. There would also be a problem with the sample in that the two ratings are not actually referring to the same thing. An OTB rating cannot be directly compared to a CC rating because the ratings are obtained under different c ...[text shortened]... atings to CC ratings is a bit like comparing the performance of a sprinter to a distance runner.
We'll take the OTB and CC rating pairs, plot them XY, and find a low-order polynomial to fit it. I think it would be very interesting.