31 Dec 04
Well we ain't made a move in almost 3 days, so I say we close the voting in 2 hours and move. I hate seeing those green boxes on My Games page! Unless there's a late run of support for the Lopez, it looks like the Scotch. I say from now on we make a three day time limit for discussion and voting for moves. What say ya?
31 Dec 04
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauder3 days it should be, but you have to realize that this thread has only been up for 2, so we have one more day for voting.
Well we ain't made a move in almost 3 days, so I say we close the voting in 2 hours and move. I hate seeing those green boxes on My Games page! Unless there's a late run of support for the Lopez, it looks like the Scotch. I s ...[text shortened]... e day time limit for discussion and voting for moves. What say ya?
-Tim
31 Dec 04
Originally posted by TimmyToiletI can't imagine why we would need three days to vote; the people following the game will surely vote on the first or at most the second day. Only three people have voted today. I would suggest two days for discussion and 1 day for voting.
3 days it should be, but you have to realize that this thread has only been up for 2, so we have one more day for voting.
-Tim
31 Dec 04
Originally posted by no1marauderWait, so first you want 3 days for voting, now you want 1 day. Make up your mind
I can't imagine why we would need three days to vote; the people following the game will surely vote on the first or at most the second day. Only three people have voted today. I would suggest two days for discussion and 1 day for voting.
31 Dec 04
Originally posted by no1marauderObviously, but you seperated it, pal. Be more clearer next time and we won't have any confusion. I agree with you on the time limit
I say from now on we make a three day time limit for discussion and voting for moves. What say ya?
Are you familiar with the meaning and use of the word "AND"?
-Tim
31 Dec 04
Originally posted by TimmyToiletWhat is is with people today thinking they're all English teachers?? If I wanted to say we should have 3 day limits for BOTH discussion and voting I would have used the word BOTH. And if you were confused, pal, you could have simply asked me to clarify rather than using your "make up your mind" crack.
Obviously, but you seperated it, pal. Be more clearer next time and we won't have any confusion. I agree with you on the time limit
-Tim
31 Dec 04
Originally posted by GrayeyesofsorrowThe Scotch has been poured!
I dont think there should be a set time, some moves might be more complex and the debate might go on longer than 3 days, but I agree we shouldnt tally around for no reason.
I think most people have voted, so we might as well make the move :-)
Well I was thinking the 3 days could be a minimum time and we could extend it if people wanted to have more discussion and do more analysis. I don't think it's always going to be necessary to even use 3 days though: recaptures, forced moves, etc.
We know Fritzie's next move unless he wants to transpose into a Philidor. Assuming he plays exd4, I say stay with the main line Nxd4: I don't think we should gambit. What's everybody else think?