18 Mar 10
Originally posted by Paul Leggettyes it is basically an accelerated dragon, mmm, your right, one should just play according to ones basic understanding of opening principles i think, this would stop us getting too bogged down with lines of this and lines of that and who knows we may even be able to do something original 🙂
I have always thought of the Catalan as a Gruenfeld or an Accelerated Dragon, but with colors reversed, and white starting out achieving one strategic objective that it takes black many moves to accomplish, if at all.
A little esoteric, I know, but thinking like that keeps me from getting to stereotyped about the game.
18 Mar 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's completely hypermodern, like you said you didn't like and it's a bit too complex for your level I think. Play the queen's gambit if you don't want to play e4, it's pretty much your only option, and it's an amazing one.
i see, perhaps something like the Catalan might be the baby for me 🙂
18 Mar 10
Originally posted by JDChessmmm, very interesting JD, ill shall check it out. i know Kasparov himself liked to play a3, in the Ruy, i used to use it against my little computer that i had, for it was not in its opening book and is really a rather excellent choice at that particular junction?
It's in Garry Kasparov's book on Fischer.
18 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Maxacre42yes you are correct it is hypermodern, my level? you mean i wont understand the strategic principles? i am quite sure that if you can understand it, then so can I. Sorry i dont know if you noticed, i want to play 1.e4, but in a positional style.
It's completely hypermodern, like you said you didn't like and it's a bit too complex for your level I think. Play the queen's gambit if you don't want to play e4, it's pretty much your only option, and it's an amazing one.
18 Mar 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSpeaking of computers an opening books, if I play c4 and transpose into a queen's gambit from there my computer doesn't know the opening, but if I start with the classic d4 it does.
mmm, very interesting JD, ill shall check it out. i know Kasparov himself liked to play a3, in the Ruy, i used to use it against my little computer that i had, for it was not in its opening book and is really a rather excellent choice at that particular junction?
18 Mar 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI never said I could understand it. I don't. It's one of the very few openings that is very popular at the IM- GM level and not catching on at all in club level. I have a few books on it and I play it, but not really well. I was only trying to help you, not offend you.
yes you are correct it is hypermodern, my level? you mean i wont understand the strategic principles? i am quite sure that if you can understand it, then so can I. Sorry i dont know if you noticed, i want to play 1.e4, but in a positional style.
18 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Maxacre42no im not offended, sorry if i have given that impression 🙂 i wonder why its not catching on, Macpo on this site plays it rather beautifully, and has given excellent annotations once or twice of his games. Beetle also plays it i think.
I never said I could understand it. I don't. It's one of the very few openings that is very popular at the IM- GM level and not catching on at all in club level. I have a few books on it and I play it, but not really well. I was only trying to help you, not offend you.
- Joined
- 07 Mar 09
- Moves
- 28919
18 Mar 10
robbie, I doubt very seriously that you and I will be sitting opposite in April of next year fighting over the world championship. Play everything! I used to never play d4 but I loved playing against it as black. One day I realized I knew a whole bunch about what were the best lines for white! So I started playing all possible moves. I'm playing a Reti now (used to play it a long, long time ago in a galaxy far away) for the first time on this site. Don't care whether I win or lose - if I do win it won't be the opening, it will be because my opponent makes a mistake - likewise if I lose! Used to never play the Caro - got killed every time - now I play it and have won! Make your weaknesses into strengths! Heck, before the year is out I will be a total apostate and play the French! The earth is my oyster! Are you experienced? I am!
18 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by TerrierJackJack my friend, in fact i started playing 1.d4 which was ok, then because i am tactically quite poor, i switched to 1.e4 as i thought that i would get more tactical games in which i would be forced to calculate. You are correct Jack, in fact after move two or three I am basically on my own. I just read somewhere that you should at least know one opening, i dont know any past move three of four except the Ruy which i know up to move six (is that not astounding?) i have been playing chess for about four years and i dont know any openings? no not one!
robbie, I doubt very seriously that you and I will be sitting opposite in April of next year fighting over the world championship. Play everything! I used to never play d4 but I loved playing against it as black. One day I realized I knew a whole bunch about what were the best lines for white! So I started playing all possible moves. I'm playing a Reti n l be a total apostate and play the French! The earth is my oyster! Are you experienced? I am!
chucka chucka wah wah, so you see, my little world wont let me go!
18 Mar 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethe contents of 1-4,
Hi, there has been much discussion about the merits of each and this is not intended to be a favouring of one over the other, but i have reached a consensus in my own mind about the style of chess that i like and was wondering if anyone could help determine what type of systems i should be employing.
1. I like pawn play rather than piece play, pa ...[text shortened]... this, for it seems to me to be rather paradoxical, i would be most indebted - regards Robbie.
supplemented with statement 5,
are contradictory.