Only Chess
12 Nov 06
Originally posted by bot 6Clearly, judging by your current rating, it is neither deep nor intellectual for you.
chess is a stupid game for fools.the only reason i play is to show you geeks that its not about this deep and intelectual thing you call logic, its about tic tac toe whoopty do. i might as well play checkers. same thing.
Originally posted by BedlamNot bad! Any in 10 or less?
14 moves isnt bad 🙂
[Event "Friendly Game, 12m + 0s"]
[Site "Main Playing Hall"]
[Date "2005.11.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Caffeinated"]
[Black "Samoht"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C00"]
[BlackElo "2589"]
[PlyCount "27"]
[EventDate "2005.11.08"]
[TimeControl "720"]
1. e4 {1} e6 {5} 2. d4 {2} d6 {10} 3. f4 {7} Nf6 {8} 4. Nc3 {3} Nbd7 {20} 5.
Nf3 {3} ...[text shortened]... {27} 13. Bxd5+ {2} Nxd5 {3} 14. Qxd5# {(Lag: Av=0.33s, max=0.5s) 1} 1-0
Originally posted by BedlamForgive me if this sounds stupid. But what's the meaning of Plycount "27"?
14 moves isnt bad 🙂
[Event "Friendly Game, 12m + 0s"]
[Site "Main Playing Hall"]
[Date "2005.11.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Caffeinated"]
[Black "Samoht"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C00"]
[BlackElo "2589"]
[PlyCount "27"]
[EventDate "2005.11.08"]
[TimeControl "720"]
1. e4 {1} e6 {5} 2. d4 {2} d6 {10} 3. f4 {7} Nf6 {8} 4. Nc3 {3} Nbd7 {20} 5.
Nf3 {3} ...[text shortened]... {27} 13. Bxd5+ {2} Nxd5 {3} 14. Qxd5# {(Lag: Av=0.33s, max=0.5s) 1} 1-0
Originally posted by BedlamOh ok. Thanks. That's something new I've learned today. Amazing, I've played chess for years before this, and yet I didn't know that! Strange thing is that I've read quite a lot of chess books, and I don't seem to have come across that term. Is that a common way to describe the number of moves in chess? I know one move means one for white and another for black, of course. I didn't know about the usage of 'ply' to mean half a move. Interesting....
ply is one half move......
ie 13 black moves and 14 white moves 🙂
Originally posted by ckoh1965Its not something iv bumped across in books either, its mainly used for the electronic part of chess, databases will tell you the ply count of the game and engines will tell you in ply how deep they are caculating.
Oh ok. Thanks. That's something new I've learned today. Amazing, I've played chess for years before this, and yet I didn't know that! Strange thing is that I've read quite a lot of chess books, and I don't seem to have come across that term. Is that a common way to describe the number of moves in chess? I know one move means one for white and another for bl ...[text shortened]... of course. I didn't know about the usage of 'ply' to mean half a move. Interesting....
Originally posted by ckoh1965I just heard it for the first time, too. I have only been playing for two years, haven't read many chess books, and haven't played at a club or anything, but I think I have come over most chess terms on the internet. I think I have heard them referred to as "half-moves".
Oh ok. Thanks. That's something new I've learned today. Amazing, I've played chess for years before this, and yet I didn't know that! Strange thing is that I've read quite a lot of chess books, and I don't seem to have come across that term. Is that a common way to describe the number of moves in chess? I know one move means one for white and another for bl ...[text shortened]... of course. I didn't know about the usage of 'ply' to mean half a move. Interesting....
Originally posted by NordlysWell, actually, you'd be surprised how much you can improve if you read books. You'll find lots of stuff. Past games and what are the ideas behind each opening. When I was at the height of my chess madness, I used to read a hell lot. I used to play in tournaments. Unfortunately, I never did win anything, but I got as far as number 7 in a local club. Then when I was transferred back to my home country, I had to give up competitive chess because of work commitments.
I just heard it for the first time, too. I have only been playing for two years, haven't read many chess books, and haven't played at a club or anything, but I think I have come over most chess terms on the internet. I think I have heard them referred to as "half-moves".
If you don't read, you'd often find yourself trapped; or you'd waste a lot of time thinking in the opening. In some openings, up to the first 10 moves might be made out of memorization, really. But of course, some games get out of book opening much sooner than that.
Now I'm trying to spare some time to do a bit of reading again. And I've just realised just hom much I've forgotten. For example, right now I'm reading about the Accelerated Dragons (John Donaldson & Jeremy Silman: CADOGAN). Anybody who has this book bill tell you that it is soooo deep, the first few chapters can drain all your mental stamina! But anyway, the dragons is a very complicated opening with lots of traps etc in it.
Try reading a bit, and you'll see that your strength will increase in no time!