Game 1 to Kramnik. It looked like Topalov could have taken a draw due to repeated position around move 40 or so (not looking at the game score right now), but showed a fighting spirit and insited on playing for a win. Took a big risk that didn't pay off, but I like the fact that he wanted to force the issue instead of just accepting a draw. Turned out decisive for Kramnik in this case, and I have to wonder if he was less interested in getting the point as he was in trying to set the tone for the match.
Originally posted by alexstclaireExactly, a pawn down. Go for the draw!
i watched the game, topalov DID have a draw!!!! he was a pawn down and still tried to attack and go for a win, i cant believe it, he had some great idea but when it came down to it he was still a pawn down....i am very disapointed🙁 but Topa can still win, 11 games left!!
Originally posted by alexstclaireI agree, he made a childish mistake. To lose the first game is a bad start, he should have taken the draw, he was playing black and he was a pawn down. If he'd drawn it would put pressure on Kramnik to win with the black pieces, which is obviously advantagious in a Match like this, it's the flipping World championship!! He might never get another chance to play for this prize and he's throwing caution to the wind.
i watched the game, topalov DID have a draw!!!! he was a pawn down and still tried to attack and go for a win, i cant believe it, he had some great idea but when it came down to it he was still a pawn down....i am very disapointed🙁 but Topa can still win, 11 games left!!
1 edit
Originally posted by TommyCYes, he's done that. But Topalov became "world champion" (a title without credibility before he earned it) by winning 6 of 7, then drawing his way to the finish.
Doesn't Topalov always lose a few at the start, then win six on the trot at the end?
Whilst Kramnik is probably thinking, just 11 draws to go...
Kramnik's win today, and his 1.d4!! are both good news to serious chess players.
Originally posted by WulebgrMy comment was a bit of a joke really. But today was a promising start for the rest of the match - competitive, interesting chess. Perhaps a bit nervous though - the game swinging from Kramnik to Topalov and finally back to Kramnik again. One point I did mean to imply is that Topalov - unlike Kramnik - is actually used to losing games. So maybe he's not psychologically damaged just yet, in spite of over-pressing with a draw in hand through a miscalculation.
Yes, he's done that. But Topalov became "world champion" (a title without credibility before he earned it) by winning 6 of 7, then drawing his way to the finish.
Kramnik's win today, and his 1.d4!! are both good news to [b]serious chess players.[/b]
I'm not really that surprised Kramnik opened 1. d4. Nf3 and c4 is all well and good when he doesn't want to lose a game in a tournament he's not got deep ambitions for, whilst I think his record with 1.e4 is relatively poor (and Topalov's Najdorf is getting good.) So that leaves... Probably Kramnik partly has been playing somewhat non-descript openings to keep his true hand close to his chest prior to this match, aswell.
Btw, anyone got any predictions for tomorrow?
I reckon we'll see a 5. Nc3 Petroff, and a draw.
Originally posted by TommyCI think that's a good call, but it is good to recall that Topalov was the one player in San Luis with a repertoire that extends beyond 1.e4. (I'd like to say that's why he won.)
Btw, anyone got any predictions for tomorrow?
I reckon we'll see a 5. Nc3 Petroff, and a draw.
He could trot out 1.c4, as Fischer did in 1972.
Originally posted by YUG0slavI think what he did to Taimanov and Larsen in 1971 and then to Spassky in 1972 is even more awesome. There seems to be so few great players that were nice guys.
That's me right there. I adore fischer as a chess player (CMON people he won the US championship with a perfect score once) But as a person, I think fischer is a sick racist.
Originally posted by MarinkatombThe consensus seems to be that Topalov was justified in trying to play for the win with the first time control ending but that 57 ...... f5 was a game losing blunder. Kramnik's play was impeccable.
I agree, he made a childish mistake. To lose the first game is a bad start, he should have taken the draw, he was playing black and he was a pawn down. If he'd drawn it would put pressure on Kramnik to win with the black pieces, which is obviously advantagious in a Match like this, it's the flipping World championship!! He might never get another chance to play for this prize and he's throwing caution to the wind.