Go back
Triple check???

Triple check???

Only Chess

buffalobill
Major Bone

On yer tail ...

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16686
Clock
19 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
Here is a rather unique 'triple double check', three consecutive double checks, the last one being checkmate

[fen]2k4r/ppp1pp1p/5npb/5b2/8/1PNr1P2/PBK1N1PP/3R3R b - - 0 15[/fen]

Black to move: Rd2++ Kc1 Rc2++ Kb1 Rc1##
Now that's pretty. Where/when did it occur?

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
19 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Now that's pretty. Where/when did it occur?
I read it in an article, it was a rather strong black player against an intermediate-level player. I don't think the game is particcularly interesting, just this final.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
19 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
God of grammar? Who are you referring to?😛
That would be me.

Wildfire
Force of Nature

The Bathroom

Joined
12 May 05
Moves
31388
Clock
20 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
That would be me.
Ha. Very funny.

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
Clock
20 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I saw a position in Yasser S, book winning chess tactics i believe which had about 11 double checks which led to a mate. It was a constructed position but pretty neat. Don't feel like posting it on here though, but look in the book.

T
Full speed locomotiv

On tracks.

Joined
03 Oct 04
Moves
12831
Clock
20 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Now that's pretty. Where/when did it occur?
Thats more like "fork you, you're dead." Sincerely, Trains44

w

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
1771
Clock
21 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just to add my 2 cents as to why triple check is impossible... usually one pice must move to uncover check by another piece, whilst also giving check itself (the except being the en passant shown earlier in this topic). It is im possible to give triple check as it would involve a piece moving, giving check, and uncovering 2 different checks, which is physically impossible, as it can only block one check path to a king.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
21 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by CrawlIce
No, a discovered double check means both checks are uncovered with one move, as in the following setup:



[fen]R1BKQ2R/1PPPBPPP/2N2N2/4P3/Pp6/k1np4/p1pbpppp/3rqbnr[/fen]

After black plays g7-g5 to block the B's check, now pxp e.p. discovers a double check.

The board is not the actual game. I just reconstructed the situation.
What move did White play before ...g7-g5?

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
21 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
What move did White play before ...g7-g5?
Ng5-f3+

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
22 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
Ng5-f3+
Yep.

k

Joined
24 Jun 04
Moves
9995
Clock
22 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bobbob1056th
There is such a thing as triple (absolute) pins though. Here's an interesting position, blacks pinning piece is pinned and the piece thats pinning the pinning piece is pinned. I think the game is interestingly enough, drawn:
[fen]rr1r3k/4b2p/4b2P/8/8/b1r3R1/1BN5/BQKQ4 b - - 0 1[/fen]
Well, if it's white to move, the best move is probably Qe1, with the simultaneous threats of Qxc3+, Qe5+, and Rxc3 with the intention of Rxa3 discovered check. If it's black's move, moving the light-squared bishop to either b3 or f5 may be best (Rxd1+ is a threat, but black doesn't want to do this immediately as that would allow white to move his/her king).

murrow
penguinpuffin

finsbury

Joined
25 Aug 04
Moves
48501
Clock
22 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
God of grammar? Who are you referring to?😛

not to you, is my guess:

'whoM are you referring to?'
or better, 'to whom are you referring?'

😵

T

Joined
27 Mar 05
Moves
88
Clock
22 May 05
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I saw a position in Yasser S, book winning chess tactics i believe which had about 11 double checks which led to a mate. It was a constructed position but pretty neat. Don't feel like posting it on here though, but look in the book.
Here is the position RahimK was talking about:






The position is taken from a "Study by A. White, 1919", as opposed to a game in which this position actually occurred.

(For those of you with Yasser's book, "Winning Chess Tactics", this is taken from "Test # 99", on page 200).

Yasser's comments in the solution section are: "This position is silly, but it is a good demonstration of the power of a double check. Belive it or not, just 12 moves produce a forced checkmate as follows:

1. Rf2+ Ke3
2. Rf3+ Ke4
3. Re3+ Kd4
4. Re4+ Kd5
5. Rd4+ Kc5
6. Rd5+ Kc6
7.Rc5+ Kb6
8. Rc6+ Kb7
9. Rb6+ Ka7
10. Rb7+ Ka8
11. Ra7+ Kb8
12. Ra8#


Here's the FEN information:

[FEN "2q5/2pp4/3pr3/4pb2/K1p2pn1/2bn1kp1/3pr1R1/6BB w - - 0 1"]

Kind of fun to watch this one play out. But at least Yasser admits that the position itself is "silly" (his word).


Wildfire
Force of Nature

The Bathroom

Joined
12 May 05
Moves
31388
Clock
22 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by murrow

not to you, is my guess:

'whoM are you referring to?'
or better, 'to whom are you referring?'

😵
Alright smart-ass, I get the point. No need to destroy my already fragile ego! :'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(

murrow
penguinpuffin

finsbury

Joined
25 Aug 04
Moves
48501
Clock
22 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wildfire
Alright smart-ass, I get the point. No need to destroy my already fragile ego! :'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(

couldn't resist i'm afraid
too ... much ... irony ...
😉

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.