Originally posted by XanthosNZHow do you know white is playing up the board? There is no reasoning behind it. As the position is illegal both ways, there is no way you can claim that. Your statement is not correct.
This statement is correct:
"White is playing up the board."
Nowhere did I say that the position was legal.
Originally posted by Dies IraeBecause white always plays to the top of the board. Hit reply and quote on the post and have a look at the FEN string that makes up the board. Paste it into a chess program and note that a1 is the bottom left.
How do you know white is playing up the board? There is no reasoning behind it. As the position is illegal both ways, there is no way you can claim that. Your statement is not correct.
It's convention that white plays up the board in diagrams.
Originally posted by MctaytoThis is what is surprising in this site..which I learnt the hard way!
basically he was not in check but the only available moves open for him would put him in check
As you can not move into check you have no moves available
therefore as you are not beaten but unable to move it is a stalemate i.e. a draw
I was playing king vs King, bishop & knight of opponent, and he was struggling to mate. After some 60 odd moves, I careless put the king in line of bishop (assumed that RHP will not allow me to do that) - Instant Mate!!
It shouldnt have been Mate but Resignation due to Illegal Move (strictly speaking)...
Originally posted by yaman007You mean Game 2903585 (this is the only KKBN ending in your games)?
This is what is surprising in this site..which I learnt the hard way!
I was playing king vs King, bishop & knight of opponent, and he was struggling to mate. After some 60 odd moves, I careless put the king in line of bishop (assumed that RHP will not allow me to do that) - Instant Mate!!
It shouldnt have been Mate but Resignation due to Illegal Move (strictly speaking)...
Because that's mate so it seems that you don't know what you are talking about. RHP doesn't use blitz rules on illegal moves (the resignation due to illegal move only occurs during blitz). Note that the last move of the game was made by the opponent.
Originally posted by sannevssrOf course you have to claim it just like you have to claim a draw by repetition. And I don't know quite what you mean by official draw (and we don't play under FIDE rules here, why would we?).
wow, did that actually happen? , thats scary,
It should have told you to play a legal move
by the way after 50 moves without pawn moves or pieces bein taken its an official draw according to fide rules, although you might have to claim it on rhp ( you have to claim it in OTB as well)
ok ok official draw didnt make much sense, just a draw,
and what do you mean we dont play under fide rules, I think we do,
those are just the general rules for chess ( like the 50 moves draw rule)
Anyway kinda funny this guy is almost 1700 but does not know whether he is bein stalemated or mated (no offence)
Originally posted by sannevssrNo actually the FIDE rules include all sorts of things. The rules of chess are only part of it. Don't believe me? Check it out for yourself, http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp.
ok ok official draw didnt make much sense, just a draw,
and what do you mean we dont play under fide rules, I think we do,
those are just the general rules for chess ( like the 50 moves draw rule)
Anyway kinda funny this guy is almost 1700 but dies nit know whether he is bein stalemated or mated (no offence)
So tell me, why should FIDE rules apply to RHP? FIDE rules are for OTB chess.