Go back
What is my rating ...

What is my rating ...

Only Chess

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
29 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294

With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?

c
¯\_(^.^)_/¯

Joined
25 Sep 05
Moves
55289
Clock
29 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294

With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
WOW, you sure showed him!

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
29 Sep 06

Parody threads are often funny, but please leave them out of the Only Chess forum as it makes it harder to find the worthwile threads.

Thanks,

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
29 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
Parody threads are often funny, but please leave them out of the Only Chess forum as it makes it harder to find the worthwile threads.

Thanks,
Seeing you asked so nicely .............

.... consider it done!

z

Joined
13 Apr 06
Moves
2683
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294

With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Is it you dragon fire? I did not think you would show your face after the cheating accusations baloney. Now you have managed to beat someone ranked nearly 1000 points below you in 2 moves. Is that the highly ranked fellow you were talking about?

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
Is it you dragon fire? I did not think you would show your face after the cheating accusations baloney. Now you have managed to beat someone ranked nearly 1000 points below you in 2 moves. Is that the highly ranked fellow you were talking about?
Lets not forget the cheating accusations Thread 52830 which is clearly baloney to you but which raised an important issue and which clarified in my mind, thanks to people like you, the justification of the reservations that some genuinely strong players seem to have.

This game is actually fairly old and if you don't know who Nybble is I am sure someone will enlighten you.

It seems to me z00t that you are another one of those posters who has nothing constructive to say and likes knocking everyone.

z

Joined
13 Apr 06
Moves
2683
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Lets not forget the cheating accusations Thread 52830 which is clearly baloney to you but which raised an important issue and which clarified in my mind, thanks to people like you, the justification of the reservations that some genuinely strong players seem to have.

It seems to me z00t that you are another one of those posters who has nothing constructive to say and likes knocking everyone.
I do not "knock everyone down". If you read the technical aspects of my comments they are perfectly valid. I would have been happy to leave the "cheating accusations" baloney alone, had it not been for the very wild 9 out of 10 claim.

As an example in the sicilian thread some guy called son of sam or the other makes some mis-statements :-

- 1) No opening gives an automatic advantage .....

- 2) Most of my wins are due to poor middlegame play....

- 3) What in the hell does "let him repeat moves" mean?

This either demonstrates a complete disregard of chess theory or a lack of understanding of some aspects of it. Should this go un-challenged?

Y

Joined
29 Jul 06
Moves
2414
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

gee...some people just can't take a joke...

H

Joined
05 Apr 06
Moves
6528
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294

With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Let me beat you and decrease you elo below the 1800s

t
King of the Ashes

Trying to rise ....

Joined
16 Jun 04
Moves
63851
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
I do not "knock everyone down". If you read the technical aspects of my comments they are perfectly valid. I would have been happy to leave the "cheating accusations" baloney alone, had it not been for the very wild 9 out of 10 claim.

As an example in the sicilian thread some guy called son of sam or the other makes some mis-statements :-

- 1) No opening ...[text shortened]... ess theory or a lack of understanding of some aspects of it. Should this go un-challenged?
You jackass. Why don't you make your comments in the appropriate thread? There is no opening that gives an automatic win. If there was, the entire game of chess would be dead and done and everyone would play that opening and always win--an extended version of tic-tac-toe, nothing less. And most of my wins are due to poor middlegame play by my opponents, as I readily admit that I am not good enough to win by positional play. I just can't hold that much crap in my head at once. When my opponent makes a mistake, I pounce. I'd hazzard a guess that most people play this way. And finally, as for "let him repeat moves," the comment of yours was vague and insubstantial, and refered to one time in the game in question where I tested my opponent by repeating a set of moves once. I'm certain that even you could find grandmaster games where moves are repeated. It takes three repeated positions to cause a draw, so go crawl back under your rock and take a nap.

Oh yeah, your deliberate misrepresenting of my name only shows what kind of person you are, interested only in insulting people and attempting to over-inflate your own intelligence and importance. Go away and learn how to communicate before you start pretending that you know everyting.

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

z

Joined
13 Apr 06
Moves
2683
Clock
30 Sep 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by son of sam
You jackass......
You know I could not resist (with a nick like that). How about a game of tic-tac-toe?

I did tell you what I have stated above in the relevant thread. You cannot illustrate a "good opening" with an irrelevant game? Who plays the Marshall because white may blunder at move 30?

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HFRorbis
Let me beat you and decrease you elo below the 1800s
Gladly, when you get up to 1700 challenge me!

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
30 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
You know I could not resist (with a nick like that). How about a game of tic-tac-toe?

I did tell you what I have stated above in the relevant thread. You cannot illustrate a "good opening" with an irrelevant game? Who plays the Marshall because white may blunder at move 30?
Doesn't this apply to every opening. With best play (rare even at GM level, let alone ours) you should end up equal, which is what most of us hope for. It is then usually an error in the middle game that decides things, especially here where databases and books can be used.

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
30 Sep 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.