- Joined
- 03 Sep 03
- Moves
- 87628
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by wormwoodOr perhaps it could be because:
prejudice..
1. subscribers are more likely to have a game history that you can review.
2. subscribers are less likely to disappear and actually finish the game.
Not everything can be contributed to ill will.
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by tmetzleryou're talking about provisional against non-provisional, not sub vs. nonsub...
Or perhaps it could be because:
1. subscribers are more likely to have a game history that you can review.
2. subscribers are less likely to disappear and actually finish the game.
Not everything can be contributed to ill will.
- Joined
- 03 Sep 03
- Moves
- 87628
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by wormwoodNo I'm not.
you're talking about provisional against non-provisional, not sub vs. nonsub...
1. Non-Subscribers are more likely to be provisional than subscribers.
2. Non-subscribers are limited to the number of games they can play and thus are less likely to have a game history that is worth reviewing.
3. Non-subscribers have not paid any money and are thus more likely to disappear from the site (leave games hanging)
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by tmetzlerwell,
No I'm not.
1. Non-Subscribers are more likely to be provisional than subscribers.
2. Non-subscribers are limited to the number of games they can play and thus are less likely to have a game history that is worth reviewing.
3. Non-subscribers have not paid any money and are thus more likely to disappear from the site (leave games hanging)
1. how on earth? everyone's provisional for the first 20 games.
2. ok, they might only have tens or a couple of hundred games, isn't that enough? I wouldn't look at more than 2-3 myself, usually not at all...
3. I have never had a non-sub quit on me, but I know some subs who have quit. I'm pretty sure it's dead even. it's even a lot easier to play through your remaining non-sub 6 games than a sub's maybe 100-200, which could even suggest quitting subs abandon more games than non-subs. a lot more.
I hear you, I just don't see it.
- Joined
- 23 Mar 04
- Moves
- 254986
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by wormwoodI can tell you it is by far not even. I am collecting skulls since a year. I have 53 skulls. Out of these 53 I have 6 games against subscriber, of which four games are pairs (clan challenge), leaving four subscibing members and 47 non subscribers.
3. I have never had a non-sub quit on me, but I know some subs who have quit. I'm pretty sure it's dead even.
- Joined
- 23 Mar 04
- Moves
- 254986
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by wormwoodBecause subscribers usually have more than six games, and because they pay for a time based subscription (and usually don't have big gaps between games), there activity is larger than non-subscribers. Hence, the subscribers have a shorter period of being provisional.
1. how on earth? everyone's provisional for the first 20 games.
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by tmetzlerno he was right it's because we are better people
Or perhaps it could be because:
1. subscribers are more likely to have a game history that you can review.
2. subscribers are less likely to disappear and actually finish the game.
Not everything can be contributed to ill will.
03 Mar 06
If more people subscribe, the greater the chance that this--very well done--chess site will be around. Bandwidth is expensive, and it needs to be paid for somehow. If people choose to only play against subscribers as a means to get more people to subscribe (thereby giving this site's success more of a guarantee), then more power to 'em.
In fact, I'm going to go add that to my profile now.
03 Mar 06
Originally posted by Aikointeresting. I'll start to keep a record too...
I can tell you it is by far not even. I am collecting skulls since a year. I have 53 skulls. Out of these 53 I have 6 games against subscriber, of which four games are pairs (clan challenge), leaving four subscibing members and 47 non subscribers.