Go back
Bezique

Bezique

Posers and Puzzles

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86173
Clock
01 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
I believe 4 Saints have Halos. If I'm right I'll go through the solution.
Correct.Well done.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 21
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda said
Correct.Well done.
Ok!

The person making the puzzles must be on a combinatorics kick. So the objective is to divvy up the 7 halos among the 7 saints leaving a certain number of saints without halos.

The solution uses the formula I derived for the last problem you posed about 4 people splitting 11 chickens. That was convenient!

Redefine "x" to be the number of saints without halos.

lets start with x = 0 ( every saint has a halo ) I know this isn't possible from the problem statement but it helps describe the progression.

Dividing up 7 halos among 7 saints gives 1 icon.

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
◙....◙....◙....◙....◙....◙....◙

The sum represents the number of halos on each saints head and the ◙ are the saints with halos and the ■ are the saints without ( this assumes the saints are indistinguishable from each other otherwise there would be 7! icons in this setup alone )

So now we go to x= 1 ( 1 saint without halo )

We break the 7 halos up into 6 summands

1○1○1○1○1○1○1

I showed how to do this in the other chicken problem.

Let S = 7 be the number of halos ( represented by the string of 7 1's above )
Let N be the number of summands ( i.e how many of the saints have halos )

If we choose 5 ○'s ( out of the 6 ○'s in total ) to be + signs we will get one instance of 7 halos shared amongst the 6 saints with halos. For this particular case we see that is equivalent to choosing which circle is NOT a "+ sign" and it should become obvious there are 6 ways of doing this.

1○1+1+1+1+1+1 = 2+1+1+1+1+1
1+1○1+1+1+1+1 = 1+2+1+1+1+1
1+1+1○1+1+1+1 = 1+1+2+1+1+1
1+1+1+1○1+1+1 = 1+1+1+2+1+1
1+1+1+1+1○1+1 = 1+1+1+1+2+1
1+1+1+1+1+1○1 = 1+1+1+1+1+2

Now lets take the 6 sum's and apply them to the to the saints; saying the farthest saint to the left is without a halo:

0 + 2 +1 +1 + 1 +1 +1
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

0 + 1 +2 +1 + 1 +1 +1
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

0 + 1 +1 +2 + 1 +1 +1
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

0 + 1 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

0 + 1 +1 +1 +1 +2 +1
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

0 + 1 +1 +1 + 1 +1 +2
■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙

However, assigning the left most saint to be the one without a halo was completely arbitrary. It could be any of the saints. There are 7 ways to choose which saint does not have a halo.

■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙
◙...■...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙
◙...◙...■...◙...◙...◙...◙
◙...◙...◙...■...◙...◙...◙
◙...◙...◙...◙...■...◙...◙
◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...■...◙
◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...◙...■

Now we have our two relationships.

The number of distinct icons that can be made is the number of ways to split 7 halos amongst ( 7 - x ) saints times the number of ways to choose x saints of 7 saints to NOT have halos.

Let I(x) be the number of distinct icons

I(x) = [ 6!/( (6-x)!*x! ) ]*[ 7!/( x!*(7-x)! ]

From here ( using a spreadsheet ) check the values of x.

We see at x = 3 ( 3 saints without halos )

I ( 3 ) = [ 5*2*2 ]*[7*5] = 700

And we are done!

Another thing to note that the problem writers stressing that exactly "x" saints have halos ( "7-x" saints as I've defined x ) is important. If they allow the number of saints that have halos vary ( some icons may have 2,3,6 halos etc...) you can sum them up in a particular way to get exactly 700 icons as well.

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86173
Clock
01 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

I approached it in a slightly different way:-
700 is always the key in these things(I know that from reading the paper every week!)
So the multiples of the number of combinations of saints v icons(7!/x!) multiplied by the possible ways of dividing the halos between the 7 saints as in the chicken problem(7!-1/x!-1))must equal 700
I discounted 1 and 7 (obviously).700 does not divide equally by 3 and 6 which leaves 2,4 and 5.
plugging 2 into the equations yields 21*6
plugging 5 into the equations yields 21*15
plugging 4 into the equations yields 35*20 which equals 700 so the answer is 4 saints(x) have halos

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda said
I approached it in a slightly different way:-
700 is always the key in these things(I know that from reading the paper every week!)
So the multiples of the number of combinations of saints v icons(7!/x!) multiplied by the possible ways of dividing the halos between the 7 saints as in the chicken problem(7!-1/x!-1))must equal 700
I discounted 1 and 7 (obviously).700 does not ...[text shortened]...
plugging 4 into the equations yields 35*20 which equals 700 so the answer is 4 saints(x) have halos
Something is wrong with the formulas you've written out, but those are the same results...so you 've probably just misrepresented them a bit. Also, ours are basically the same method. Good solve!

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Back to the Bezique problem.

The probability of holding double Bezique as I understand it ( 2, Q, S+ 2, J, D ) after drawing 32 cards ( half of the deck - your opponent drawing the other half ) is:

C ( 32,4 )*C( 4,2)*2*2/( 64*63*62*61 ) = 35960*6*2*2/( 64*63*62*61 ) ≈ 6/100

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86173
Clock
02 Feb 21

@joe-shmo said
Back to the Bezique problem.

The probability of holding double Bezique as I understand it ( 2, Q, S+ 2, J, D ) after drawing 32 cards ( half of the deck - your opponent drawing the other half ) is:

C ( 32,4 )*C( 4,2)*2*2/( 64*63*62*61 ) = 35960*6*2*2/( 64*63*62*61 ) ≈ 6/100
Thanks for all your input my friend.
I'll keep looking at the Times puzzles to see if anything interesting comes up.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.