Go back
Closed, finite set under *.

Closed, finite set under *.

Posers and Puzzles

aw
Baby Gauss

Ceres

Joined
14 Oct 06
Moves
18375
Clock
11 Oct 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheMaster37
Alas, you still haven't seen my counterexample.

The set I gave is finite, closed and commutative. Yet no identity.
It is not closed. You don't have a product that results in B.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adam warlock
It is not closed. You don't have a product that results in B.
That doesn't matter. All that matters is that the result is contained in the set.

aw
Baby Gauss

Ceres

Joined
14 Oct 06
Moves
18375
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
That doesn't matter. All that matters is that the result is contained in the set.
You're right! And he's right too.

g
Wayward Soul

Your Blackened Sky

Joined
12 Mar 02
Moves
15128
Clock
12 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheMaster37
The problem I have is that it might be a unit for this single element a[k].

For an element to be called 1, you need a * 1 = 1 * a = a for ALL elements a in the group.

Make two 2x2 matrices;

0 0 = A
0 0

0 1 = B
0 0


The set {A ,B} is closed under multiplication;

A*A = A
A*B = A
B*A = A
B*B = A

But neither of the two eleme ...[text shortened]... tity; there is no element X so that B*X = X*B = B.

Above is even a commutative closed group.
How about a set, as before, but with the conditionb that there is no element such that 0.a=a for all a in the set S?

I don't like cheap counter-examples. I always miss them and do copious amounts of hard work instead...

T
Kupikupopo!

Out of my mind

Joined
25 Oct 02
Moves
20443
Clock
14 Oct 07
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by genius
How about a set, as before, but with the conditionb that there is no element such that 0.a=a for all a in the set S?

I don't like cheap counter-examples. I always miss them and do copious amounts of hard work instead...
I suspect you mean that there is no element a, not equal to 0, so that a*b = 0 for some b?

I still think there is a counterexample. Commutativity is a big thing to lose.

I'm trying to think of a group that works like this:

a*a = a
b*b = b
a*b = a
b*a = b

Then there would be no element 1 that satisfies
1*a = a*1 = a
AND
1*b = b*1 = b

EDIT:
Got it

1 1 = a
0 0

1 0 = b
0 0

The set { a , b } is closed under multiplication, has no 0, is not commutative and has no 1.

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
14 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheMaster37

EDIT:
Got it

1 1 = a
0 0

1 0 = b
0 0

The set { a , b } is closed under multiplication, has no 0, is not commutative and has no 1.
Nice work.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.