Originally posted by iraqi insurgentThat is almost a good point...
What if the rock was huge but hollow..
Now the rock has only displaced it's wieght volume not it's mass volume and now the water would have to raise in level in accordance with the extra displacement of size....
so it depends on whether or not the rock is hollow or very light
...which is why in the question I stated that the rock sinks to the bottom of the pool. If it was less dense than the water, it would of course have floated.
mtthw,
your right you did and i apologise for the lazy reading of your original post,
and again your right it was almost a good point, however if the rock was large and its hollow centre small the mass of the rock would still sink it (many ships cannon balls were hollow and all sank)
the pool level would still rise equally to the volume of the undisplaced hollow