05 Nov 14
Originally posted by humyPlease don't comment in this matter any more. There is a place, called Spiritual Forum, where these kind of matters are discussed. Here in the Science Forum we discuss Science, and not spiritual mattes, nor spiritual people.
no, this is the right place because, excluding yourself, some of us here are science experts. You are just an ignorant arrogant trolling opinionated moron who is not a scientist and who arrogantly thinks he knows better than the scientists here and everywhere else.
05 Nov 14
Originally posted by DeepThoughtProbably?
The universe is estimated to be 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years old. The oldest star HD 140283 is estimated to be 14.46 ± 0.8 billion years old. The central value for the age of the oldest star is older than the central value for the estimated age of the universe. However these figures come with errors and the lower bound of the age of the star is 13.66 ...[text shortened]... rrect answer is that the estimate for the age of HD140283 is probably a little on the high side.
It's just plain wrong.