30 Nov 08
Originally posted by KellyJaySo you admit now that you don't have any ideas of your own, that you are unable to think outside your little biblical box? That if you have to chose between the bible or science, you're rather anti-science and probiblical?
Yes, my belief on creation is based upon the Bible, and is faith based.
01 Dec 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasThat still doesn't excuse your insulting him. Stick to the point and answer him.
But your belief on creation *is* based on your religion. Every time you deny evolution and science, you do it of religious reasons.
So bring your anti-evolutionary, and anti-science, argumentation to the Spiritual Forum, where it belongs.
01 Dec 08
1 edit
Originally posted by PinkFloydDo you say that cristians are more sensitive against insults? And that non-christians are tougher? Read what insults KellyJay has used against me, in order to win discussions, and you'll see that my 'insults' against KJ are quite mild.
That still doesn't excuse your insulting him. Stick to the point and answer him.
KellyJay is not interested in answering questions put to him. And that's because he can't answer them without admitting that he doesn't know what he is talking about. B.t.w. what (serious) questions has he put to me?
I say that science are to be discussed in Science Forum, and spiritual matters in Spiritual Forum. Anything beyond this is off-topic.
01 Dec 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasI've always admitted that, pull your head out and start reading what
So you admit now that you don't have any ideas of your own, that you are unable to think outside your little biblical box? That if you have to chose between the bible or science, you're rather anti-science and probiblical?
people write, instead of your brain dead mind reading tricks you may
actually start seeing more that just that as well.
My arguments against evolution have nothing to do with the Bible,
they have to do with evolution itself. I never bring to the table here,
evolution is wrong because the Bible says so, you are the one that
beats that drum daily not me.
Kelly
01 Dec 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasSo why do you continue to drag spiritual matters into the science
Do you say that cristians are more sensitive against insults? And that non-christians are tougher? Read what insults KellyJay has used against me, in order to win discussions, and you'll see that my 'insults' against KJ are quite mild.
KellyJay is not interested in answering questions put to him. And that's because he can't answer them without admittin ...[text shortened]... cience Forum, and spiritual matters in Spiritual Forum. Anything beyond this is off-topic.
forum? It isn't me that starts this off into a discussion on spiritual
matters here, you do it more than anyone else. When you refuse
to discuss the points being brought up, instead you spew your silly
anti-science garbage as if that were an answer to questions being
asked.
Kelly
01 Dec 08
Originally posted by KellyJayHow do you 'prove' that 2+2 doesn't = 5?
Yea, if you were offering anything like that sure, but you don't, you
give me your opinion over some of my objects and call your opnion
truth. Still, again, do I insult you while we disagree? You have corrected
me when I let my temper get the better of me and I insult others,
yet for you the standard is insult, because we disagree?
Kelly
Furthermore, at what point does observation lead you to inductively conclude
that something is almost certainly true?
Nemesio
01 Dec 08
Originally posted by KellyJay-that’s odd -I got the distinct impression that it is you who do exactly all those things!
So why do you continue to drag spiritual matters into the science
forum? It isn't me that starts this off into a discussion on spiritual
matters here, you do it more than anyone else. When you refuse
to discuss the points being brought up, instead you spew your silly
anti-science garbage as if that were an answer to questions being
asked.
Kelly
i.e. continuely drag spiritual matters into the science forum;
refuse to discuss the points being brought up (specifically, don’t answer certain questions);
spew anti-science as if that were an answer to questions being asked.