Go back
Atomic energy V kinetic weapons, question:

Atomic energy V kinetic weapons, question:

Science

AThousandYoung
Chato de Shamrock

tinyurl.com/2s4b6bmx

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26929
Clock
10 Oct 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe shmo
density doesn't have to do with kinetic energy.

what ATHY did was this

density = mass/Volume

so

m = d*V

and

Ke = (1/2)(d*V)(v^2)

but he too forgot the factor of (1/2)....😕
Ah, very good catch. I did indeed forget the 1/2.

AThousandYoung
Chato de Shamrock

tinyurl.com/2s4b6bmx

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26929
Clock
10 Oct 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe beyser
One thing is certain, and that is if an object is moving fast enough to have the kinetic energy of a small atom bomb, then at least that amount of energy is required to accelerate it. No matter if it is an ounce of tungsten or a couple of tons.
Yes. That energy is either put in when the tungsten rod is sent into orbit by rockets and stored as gravitational potential energy, or the projectile is made from asteroids and in that case the gravitational potential energy was already there.

OMG I just had an idea!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Oct 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Yes. That energy is either put in when the tungsten rod is sent into orbit by rockets and stored as gravitational potential energy, or the projectile is made from asteroids and in that case the gravitational potential energy was already there.

OMG I just had an idea!
Was that the big surprise for you, that you actually had an idea?🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.