Originally posted by MISTER CHESS"learning" what? I was talking specifically about algebra (and nothing else ) which is a language of sorts.
Children learning quicker than adults is a myth. Depending on what age you classify children and adults.
It is a well known documented fact that Children of virtually all ages find it easier and quicker to learn a foreign language than an adult. This is because the child's brain generally has greater flexibility and adaptability and the ability to rapidly grow new neural connections when it comes to learning language while adults, don't. I would surely think the same must be true for algebra because, after all, although it is not a 'natural language', it is a kind of language nevertheless.
My mother, who is perfectly intelligent, never went to school and thus never learned algebra. She once tried to learn it as an adult and she for one will testify to how hard it is to learn such a thing (she never had any success ) if you were never taught algebra at school! This has meant that, hypothetically, if she wanted a career in science or engineering, extremely sadly, she would just have to forget it! -and that just would not be fair.
Originally posted by twhiteheadThey pass their college algebra class. They just get nothing out of it.
It is a waste of time trying to teach and advance course in anything to someone who has not done the beginner course. You are basically talking about students who didn't do enough math in school, then get to college and want to do something that requires math. And they fail as a result.
Surely this is a good argument for improving math education in schoo ...[text shortened]... o the more advanced math have little hope of doing anything science related at university level.
Originally posted by sonhouseYou know that they learned something that is simply buried?
Maybe the learning gets buried but it is still there, their brains are better off for the learning, even if it doesn't show up right away.
I take it that you are against testing in general because it can't test knowledge that's buried.
09 Dec 13
Originally posted by EladarYep, let's just keep dumbing down education in the US. If a kid doesn't understand something in 5 seconds with little effort, let's just toss it out. Why ruin their childhood by making them work their brains a bit.
I didn't say it wasn't useful. I just said taking it is a waste of time, money and effort for many. Making it a requirement for all is simply stupid.
Originally posted by PhrannyI believe that is one of the main objectives of the Texas Board of Education. 🙄🙄
Yep, let's just keep dumbing down education in the US. If a kid doesn't understand something in 5 seconds with little effort, let's just toss it out. Why ruin their childhood by making them work their brains a bit.
Originally posted by RJHindselectrician
There is no need to hold up a person from graduating from high school just because they have no credit for algebra 2. That can be learned in college, if necessary. I am not aware of any jobs available to high school graduates in the U.S. that require a need for understanding algebra 2.
The Instructor
just to show how ridiculous that claim is.
Originally posted by PhrannyIf you want to make kids learn then require them to pass a competency exam. Making them take a class, but not requiring them to learn is what we have today.
Yep, let's just keep dumbing down education in the US. If a kid doesn't understand something in 5 seconds with little effort, let's just toss it out. Why ruin their childhood by making them work their brains a bit.
It is a total waste of time and money.
Originally posted by PonderableAlgebra I and Spanish I is good enough for most high school students in Texas. Algebra II and Spanish II should be elective, as well as any courses to be an electrician, carpenter, etc.
electrician
just to show how ridiculous that claim is.
P.S. I graduated from a high school in Texas many years ago. I remember taking geometry, trigonometry, and Algebra I and II, but only Spanish I. I still qualified to enter college. Some chose to take vocational courses, like 4H or carpentry, instead.
Originally posted by EladarHow would you go about "requiring" students to learn?
If you want to make kids learn then require them to pass a competency exam. Making them take a class, but not requiring them to learn is what we have today.
It is a total waste of time and money.
Are you going to turn pedagogy upside down with your revelations?
Originally posted by wolfgang59That would be where inspiring teachers come in. If the teachers are the result of the previous generation of so-so education, what do you think the next generation is going to get in the way of teachers?
How would you go about "requiring" students to learn?
Are you going to turn pedagogy upside down with your revelations?