Gravity.

Originally posted by mikelom
The Buddha said do not kill! (animals included)

If an animal is not slain by a Buddhist, but is already dead, then to eat it is not killing. It is acceptable!

So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.

Originally posted by mikelom
The Buddha said do not kill! (animals included)

If an animal is not slain by a Buddhist, but is already dead, then to eat it is not killing. It is acceptable!

Get your facts right!

For you to disdainfully say "any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist" is unquantified, and completely misunderstood.

There are five principal rules. If one can me ...[text shortened]... again, and come back to me with some, at least, incremental understanding of Buddhism.

-m.

Eating meat puts demand on the killing machine the slaughter house - so if one eats meat they are implicated in the animal killed.

No meat eating.

No demand.

No slaughter houses.

Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.

Originally posted by twhitehead
So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.

A buddhist should worry about the happiness of all beings, the guy at the abbottoir and the cows included.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
A buddhist should worry about the happiness of all beings, the guy at the abbottoir and the cows included.

A Buddhist should? What? Are we special? 😕

Originally posted by Dasa
Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.

😀 😀 You are so funny! 😀 😀

Edit: I see Chicken Biryani is a specialist common dish of your country!
Any words on that one?

And for the Christians... what was it about 5 loaves and 2 fish(es) I forgot? Did Jesus magically create 2 dead fish?

Look at your own pastures before you try to morally put down mine! 😛 😀

-m.

Originally posted by mikelom
A Buddhist should? What? Are we special? 😕

I stand corrected.

Originally posted by twhitehead
So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.

Who said anything about me paying? ? ?

I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think I wrote such nonsense. 😛

Originally posted by Dasa
Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.

Dasa, you are using the word "not" incorrectly.

Originally posted by FMF
Dasa, you are using the word "not" incorrectly.

😀

Now that's witty!

Originally posted by mikelom
I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think I wrote such nonsense. 😛

I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think a train of thought was involved in anything Dasa wrote.

Richard

Originally posted by Shallow Blue
I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think a train of thought was involved in anything Dasa wrote.

Richard

If you check the records my response about examination was to twhitehead, as he questioned me as a Buddhist to examine myself as if I personally kill animals, not to Dasa. 😉

Trains of thought with Dasa only exist in a world of self-delusion, psychotic indoctination, and complete foolishness. Those latter three being highly conclusive in his/her/its knowledge of REAL proven science. (I can't identify the 3rd person singular it relates itself to 😳)

-m.