@metal-brain saidAnd yet, you saying it does make it so?
Show me the quotes. Saying it doesn't make it so.
@metal-brain saidWhy do you still post here? You've shown over and over a profound inability to understand what is being said.
Just stating a fact. How else could you cut it up into little pieces and it will assemble again? It doesn't operate with a brain. A brain only operates in the piece that has the brain. It doesn't need a brain and it has certain advantages.
God, it's like Trump wandered in here.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
12 Mar 22
@metal-brain saidWhat? Show you "the quotes" that say that your article doesn't say a particular thing? I could only do that if it explicitly denied what you say. It doesn't; rather, it says nothing about it. I have no quote saying it says nothing about human brains, because it says nothing about human brains and therefore there are no quotes. None for, none against. None.
Show me the quotes. Saying it doesn't make it so.
Yet you insist that it does say something about human brains. You have no quotes saying it does, you just insist it does and insist that I provide a quote saying it doesn't. Sorry, little boy, but you made a definite statement, therefore you must provide the quotes. All I have to do is note that your quotes ain't there.
Do you even know how quotation works at all!?
@shallow-blue saidYou said this:
What? Show you "the quotes" that say that your article doesn't say a particular thing? I could only do that if it explicitly denied what you say. It doesn't; rather, it says nothing about it. I have no quote saying it says nothing about human brains, because it says nothing about human brains and therefore there are no quotes. None for, ...[text shortened]... I have to do is note that your quotes ain't there.
Do you even know how quotation works at all!?
"It did? Astounding. In three paragraphs, your press cutting explained how a human brain can restore itself as easily as a hydra's two-dimensional neural net."
You said the article said something. Show me the quotes. Stop lying. This isn't about what wasn't said, it is about what you claimed the article did say.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@metal-brain saidSo... you prove, again, that you are too stupid to understand sarcasm. That is nothing new, though.
You said this:
"It did? Astounding. In three paragraphs, your press cutting explained how a human brain can restore itself as easily as a hydra's two-dimensional neural net."
You said the article said something. Show me the quotes. Stop lying. This isn't about what wasn't said, it is about what you claimed the article did say.
@shallow-blue saidSo you have no point as usual.
So... you prove, again, that you are too stupid to understand sarcasm. That is nothing new, though.
Don't you have a better hobby than trolling?
@sonhouse saidWho posted about conspiracy theories the most on this thread? You kept bringing it up over and over again. You seem to be obsessed about it. This thread is about doing something about the aging process for longevity. You don't want to talk about that though. You keep interjecting the fantasy.
@Suzianne
It is worse than that. MH understands perfectly but has OCD and can only keep up the barrage of fantasy.
Stop projecting.
17 Mar 22
@Metal-Brain
YOU are the conspiracy expert. I post VERIFIABLE sites, stuff independently vetted for accuracy as opposed to you who love to post OPINION pieces unverifiable.
18 Mar 22
@sonhouse said"I post VERIFIABLE sites"
@Metal-Brain
YOU are the conspiracy expert. I post VERIFIABLE sites, stuff independently vetted for accuracy as opposed to you who love to post OPINION pieces unverifiable.
Is that what you think? You claimed Rachel Maddow didn't lie about the gene vaccines when she did. Posted the video and everything to prove it.
You are full of it.
18 Mar 22
@Metal-Brain
You NEVER watched Maddow and you know that full well so you rely on your twisted sources instead of actually watching a show of hers to see for yourself the supposed lies she spews.
Instead, you just REpuke the same crap as your ultrarightwingnutjob buddies.
But, we KNOW all that and know exactly where your credibility lies, that is, WAY underwater, Marianas Trench kind of deep underwater.
19 Mar 22
@sonhouse saidDore played clips of her show and she said those lies. I watched that part of Maddows show. That was enough to know she lied. Here it is again. Watch the videos.
@Metal-Brain
You NEVER watched Maddow and you know that full well so you rely on your twisted sources instead of actually watching a show of hers to see for yourself the supposed lies she spews.
Instead, you just REpuke the same crap as your ultrarightwingnutjob buddies.
But, we KNOW all that and know exactly where your credibility lies, that is, WAY underwater, Marianas Trench kind of deep underwater.
https://rumble.com/vro512-rachel-maddows-non-stop-covid-lies.html
19 Mar 22
@Metal-Brain
Sounds like they don't age but that doesn't mean that genetic trick can be transferred to humans.
Is that what your point is, to see if humans can become immortal?
If humans became immortal that would kill scientific discovery since the minds that became immortal would most likely become static and unchanging.
My guess anyway.
20 Mar 22
@sonhouse said"Is that what your point is, to see if humans can become immortal?"
@Metal-Brain
Sounds like they don't age but that doesn't mean that genetic trick can be transferred to humans.
Is that what your point is, to see if humans can become immortal?
If humans became immortal that would kill scientific discovery since the minds that became immortal would most likely become static and unchanging.
My guess anyway.
Sort of. Even an ageless person can die, but yes.
Nothing is static and unchanging that lives.