@wildgrass saidThat explains nothing.
Sure.... here you go.RESEARCHERS WHO STUDY Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly elevated to super star status in genetic studies by Nobel laureate Thomas Hunt Morgan, have never reported a Yoda, GHR-KO 11C, or IdG1-030. “There is no oldest fly,” says Marc Tatar, an evolutionary biologist at Brown University. “We don't really pay that much attention. People who wo ...[text shortened]... including the comically named Indy (I'm not dead yet)—that affect metabolic pathways.
@wildgrass saidSo you want to burden those that know you are wrong? What have you proved again?
I guess you'll have to read the article then.
@metal-brain saidI'm not sure why you feel compelled to resort to aggressive confrontation every time. I just thought you might be interested in reading that article.
So you want to burden those that know you are wrong? What have you proved again?
@wildgrass saidI had exactly the same kind of nasty hateful response from him earlier in this thread when I did nothing to provoke it and merely mentioned something that I honestly thought he might find interesting. Apparently he cannot handle people here being nice to him.
I'm not sure why you feel compelled to resort to aggressive confrontation every time. I just thought you might be interested in reading that article.
for anyone who is interested what causes the aging process that leads to death from old age in humans and how it might be slowed down to prolong life, there is no current scientific consensus on that and the answer seems complicated but here is just some of the relevant research I have seen on the subject;
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190214100036.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180620125933.htm
http://theconversation.com/ageing-in-human-cells-successfully-reversed-in-the-lab-101214
https://www.the-scientist.com/features/how-we-age-35872
http://phys.org/news/2013-09-weakest-link-aging-proteome.html
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-09-aging.html
@humy saidI think it boils down to choosing the right parents.
for anyone who is interested what causes the aging process that leads to death from old age in humans and how it might be slowed down to prolong life, there is no current scientific consensus on that and the answer seems complicated but here is just some of the relevant research I have seen on the subject;
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190214100036.htm
http ...[text shortened]... rg/news/2013-09-weakest-link-aging-proteome.html
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-09-aging.html
BTW, my mom is alive and well, reads every day. Will be 100 come December.
@wildgrass saidIf you read it you could easily copy and paste the relevant info and save me a lot of unnecessary reading. Since you seem unwilling to do that I question whether you really read anything there at all. People on this forum often bluff and claim long articles contain thing that are simply not there. Humy has done that to me before and I wasted a considerable amount of time just to find out he was lying.
I'm not sure why you feel compelled to resort to aggressive confrontation every time. I just thought you might be interested in reading that article.
As much as I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt my time is worth more than reading a long article that may or may not contain the information that you claim. If my skepticism is unwarranted blame humy and sonhouse for it. They like wasting peoples time out of spite and it is possible you are the same way. Copy and paste it if it is really true.
@metal-brain saidThe one Wild posted was only one page long, just a few hundred words. You are bitching about an article that short? About a shark they think is 500 years old?
If you read it you could easily copy and paste the relevant info and save me a lot of unnecessary reading. Since you seem unwilling to do that I question whether you really read anything there at all. People on this forum often bluff and claim long articles contain thing that are simply not there. Humy has done that to me before and I wasted a considerable amount of time ...[text shortened]... s time out of spite and it is possible you are the same way. Copy and paste it if it is really true.
@sonhouse saidNonsense. The article from the link he posted is long as hell. Read it yourself if you think it is so short and copy and paste it for me while you are at it.
The one Wild posted was only one page long, just a few hundred words. You are bitching about an article that short? About a shark they think is 500 years old?
@metal-brain saidI think that was your post, sorry about that. Am at work, can't spend much time here.
Nonsense. The article from the link he posted is long as hell. Read it yourself if you think it is so short and copy and paste it for me while you are at it.
One I saw from Wild, was from AAAS and required login. I didn't log in, don't know if I even can. Was that the one?
@metal-brain saidThe brief news article was titled "Death–defying experiments" and related to your OP about pushing the limits of lifespan in a variety of experimental models. Its short, and I thought you might enjoy reading it, given your interest in the topic. There is no need to get snooty about it, just don't read it if you don't want to.
If you read it you could easily copy and paste the relevant info and save me a lot of unnecessary reading. Since you seem unwilling to do that I question whether you really read anything there at all. People on this forum often bluff and claim long articles contain thing that are simply not there. Humy has done that to me before and I wasted a considerable amount of time ...[text shortened]... s time out of spite and it is possible you are the same way. Copy and paste it if it is really true.
@metal-brain saidI am 48, in thirty years or so I will die. This is something I accept, if reluctantly. There is no reason to cling on. You need to overcome your fear of death.
Selective breeding can lengthen life span. This has been proven with flies. Find out which changes took place and then ask yourself if it can be done.
Why do you think population increase is bad? Besides, people do not always die of old age. People die in cars, war and risky selfies. Are you condoning genocide to decrease the population? If more people is bad, less people is good, right?
@wildgrass saidIt is not short. That is a lie. Perhaps you would like to post it again to show how short it is, liar!
The brief news article was titled "Death–defying experiments" and related to your OP about pushing the limits of lifespan in a variety of experimental models. Its short, and I thought you might enjoy reading it, given your interest in the topic. There is no need to get snooty about it, just don't read it if you don't want to.
@deepthought saidI have no fear of death. This world is deeply flawed and dying in my sleep tonight would be fine with me. You do not know me.
I am 48, in thirty years or so I will die. This is something I accept, if reluctantly. There is no reason to cling on. You need to overcome your fear of death.