184d
@Metal-Brain saidThe truth is not a conspiracy theory.
I was referring to the false allegations Trump conspired with Russia to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/look-how-many-times-democrats-claimed-trump-stole-the-election-without-any-indictments/ar-AA1fp4TY
184d
@Suzianne saidIf it could be proven true it would not be a conspiracy theory, but you cannot prove it so you are in denial it is a conspiracy theory.
The truth is not a conspiracy theory.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned in disgrace from the DNC because she was exposed for conspiring to election meddle against Bernie Sanders. Why do you think whoever exposed her for it is the election meddler? Are you mentally ill?
184d
@sonhouse saidAre you mentally ill?
@Metal-Brain
Oh you mean the words spoken by Trump 'Russia, if you are watching, get the emails' and 2 days later the DNC was raided.
Right, no collusion.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-asked-russia-to-find-clintons-emails-on-or-around-the-same-day-russians-targeted-her-accounts
I guess you will pull the 'AI defense' THAT WAS NOT TRUMP SPEAKING. It was a Democrat AI making a fake video to besmirch the name of Trump. Right?
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. What part of "no evidence of exfiltration" do you not understand?
https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html
And once again you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiring to election meddle in the DNC. Only in your twisted world is exposing election meddling considered election meddling. It was actually Seth Rich who leaked those emails. How many days later did Seth get a bullet in the back? Right, just a coincidence like Rumsfeld saying the DOD had trillions of $ unaccounted for and the next day was 911.
Why are you so selective in believing coincidences prove a conspiracy?
You often accept them when it satisfies your partisan bias, yet GW Bush and Rumsfeld were republicans and you accept that was a mere coincidence. Why?
184d
@Metal-Brain saidWhy do you believe liars?
Are you mentally ill?
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. What part of "no evidence of exfiltration" do you not understand?
https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html
And once again you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiring to elect ...[text shortened]... san bias, yet GW Bush and Rumsfeld were republicans and you accept that was a mere coincidence. Why?
Professional courtesy?
184d
@Suzianne
Are you mentally ill?
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. What part of "no evidence of exfiltration" do you not understand?
https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html
And once again you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiring to elect ...[text shortened]... san bias, yet GW Bush and Rumsfeld were republicans and you accept that was a mere coincidence. Why?
184d
@Suzianne
The FBI initially claimed that they didn't have said records - only to later admit to being in possession of Rich's personal and work computers, along with other items.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-stonewalls-over-seth-rich-laptop-production
The FBI are liars. Your heroes.
184d
@Metal-Brain saidYour lies are lies, untrue. This "Crowdstrike" was clearly paid for their opinion.
@Suzianne
Are you mentally ill?
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC. What part of "no evidence of exfiltration" do you not understand?
https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html
And once again you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiri ...[text shortened]... san bias, yet GW Bush and Rumsfeld were republicans and you accept that was a mere coincidence. Why?
The rest of your nonsense about DWS is unhinged nonsense.
184d
@Metal-Brain saidNo idea what this has to do with anything.
@Suzianne
The FBI initially claimed that they didn't have said records - only to later admit to being in possession of Rich's personal and work computers, along with other items.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-stonewalls-over-seth-rich-laptop-production
The FBI are liars. Your heroes.
184d
@Suzianne saidAre you claiming Shawn Henry lied under oath to congress?
Your lies are lies, untrue. This "Crowdstrike" was clearly paid for their opinion.
The rest of your nonsense about DWS is unhinged nonsense.
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html#!
https://www.crowdstrike.com/about-crowdstrike/executive-team/shawn-henry/
184d
@Suzianne saidWhy you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiring to election meddle in the DNC. Only in your twisted world is exposing election meddling considered election meddling.
Your lies are lies, untrue. This "Crowdstrike" was clearly paid for their opinion.
The rest of your nonsense about DWS is unhinged nonsense.
If you exposed election meddling in the republican party would you be the real election meddler? Seth Rich is the leaker. That is why he got a bullet in the back and nobody took his money.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/fbi-defies-court-order-to-turn-over-seth-rich-documents/ar-AA1n1ZSf
Why did the FBI defy the court order? Because Russia did it? LOL!
184d
@Metal-Brain saidSo why do you believe him, when you don't believe anything that challenges your dreamstate?
Are you claiming Shawn Henry lied under oath to congress?
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated"
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-fir ...[text shortened]... ck_of_dnc_123596.html#!
https://www.crowdstrike.com/about-crowdstrike/executive-team/shawn-henry/
184d
@Metal-Brain saidAs I said, unhinged nonsense.
Why you are trying to demonize the leaker that exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz for conspiring to election meddle in the DNC. Only in your twisted world is exposing election meddling considered election meddling.
If you exposed election meddling in the republican party would you be the real election meddler? Seth Rich is the leaker. That is why he got a bullet in the b ...[text shortened]... seth-rich-documents/ar-AA1n1ZSf
Why did the FBI defy the court order? Because Russia did it? LOL!
183d
@Metal-Brain
That is BS and totally proven wrong, they even got the ID's of the Russian comps in the hack.
But you are a commie COMRADE and not worth arguing with.
183d
@sonhouse saidSo our government said specific people in Russia are guilty of exfiltrating what Shawn Henry said Crowdstrike had no evidence of exfiltration? Congrads! You just proved our government lied to you!
@Metal-Brain
That is BS and totally proven wrong, they even got the ID's of the Russian comps in the hack.
But you are a commie COMRADE and not worth arguing with.
But you respect the liars, don't you? You worship the liars. Right?