Go back
Oldest living things on Earth:

Oldest living things on Earth:

Science

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
10 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://news.yahoo.com/earths-oldest-living-things-immortalized-stunning-photos-140544982.html

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
10 Apr 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://news.yahoo.com/earths-oldest-living-things-immortalized-stunning-photos-140544982.html
Can't you tell B.S. from truth? This claim is B.S.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
10 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Can't you tell B.S. from truth? This claim is B.S.
What? RJ saying this is BS. Who would have known?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
10 Apr 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
What? RJ saying this is BS. Who would have known?
I call 'em as I see 'em.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
10 Apr 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
I call 'em as I see 'em.
...and soon he will use youtube to prove his point.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
10 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by FabianFnas
...and soon he will use youtube to prove his point.
I don't need Youtube. I'll use my own knowledge of the subject. She is referring to bacteria colonies and not individual bacteria. They are just guessing at the age of the bacteria colonies for there is no way to know the date it began growing. She apparently thinks this old age claim will bring her work more attention. It appears to have worked for sonhouse. However, I am not fooled by that B.S. since I hear it all the time.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
11 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't need Youtube. I'll use my own knowledge of the subject. She is referring to bacteria colonies and not individual bacteria. They are just guessing at the age of the bacteria colonies for there is no way to know the date it began growing. She apparently thinks this old age claim will bring her work more attention. It appears to have worked for sonhouse. However, I am not fooled by that B.S. since I hear it all the time.
Yes you do. You always use Youtube to prove things. You connect your YEC ideas very tight with Youtube. If you cannot find anything that supports your views in Youtube you feel lost.

So when do you present a clip from your holy Youtube?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
11 Apr 14

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Yes you do. You always use Youtube to prove things. You connect your YEC ideas very tight with Youtube. If you cannot find anything that supports your views in Youtube you feel lost.

So when do you present a clip from your holy Youtube?
Many people do not understand things well by just reading about them. If I know of a Youtube video that presents some of the information needed, I feel I am doing a service by referring to that video. It is often said that a picture is worth a thousand words.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
11 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Many people do not understand things well by just reading about them. If I know of a Youtube video that presents some of the information needed, I feel I am doing a service by referring to that video. It is often said that a picture is worth a thousand words.
Yes, and a picture of a lie is also worth thousands of lying words.

No, actually, you do us a favour if you look at the clips before you actually present it. The same goes for all your links too.

It would be best if you learn things before you say you know them. You make yourself a moron quite often, you know, by presenting creational things in the Science forum pretending it is pure science.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
11 Apr 14

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Yes, and a picture of a lie is also worth thousands of lying words.

No, actually, you do us a favour if you look at the clips before you actually present it. The same goes for all your links too.

It would be best if you learn things before you say you know them. You make yourself a moron quite often, you know, by presenting creational things in the Science forum pretending it is pure science.
You are getting confused with the videos I present on the Spirituality Forum. I present those pertaining to science here.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are getting confused with the videos I present on the Spirituality Forum. I present those pertaining to science here.
So you admit the vid's you present in spiritual that try to prove the YEC POV is NOT science?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
11 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
So you admit the vid's you present in spiritual that try to prove the YEC POV is NOT science?
I also present videos in the Spirituality Forum pertaining to science when it is related to a spirituality question.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I also present videos in the Spirituality Forum pertaining to science when it is related to a spirituality question.
Which is an oblique way of saying yes.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
12 Apr 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
Which is an oblique way of saying yes.
Science can be used to support the YEC point of view or the Old Earth Evolution point of view. However, you seem not to understand that the Old Earth Evolution point of view is also not proven science either. They are both based on theories that need to be investigated by the scientific methods.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
12 Apr 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Science can be used to support the YEC point of view or the Old Earth Evolution point of view. However, you seem not to understand that the Old Earth Evolution point of view is also not proven science either. They are both based on theories that need to be investigated by the scientific methods.
Er, evolution has been investigated for a couple hundred years now, and it thoroughly defeats creationism hands down. The ONLY thing you have is to grouse that it doesn't follow the fairy tales of ancient Egyptian mythology.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.