Go back
Part 2 - The Big Bang Theory Wrong?

Part 2 - The Big Bang Theory Wrong?

Science

bikingviking

Joined
21 Jun 06
Moves
82236
Clock
09 Oct 13
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

""""""( There are like 30 different RNAs, your teacher in biology perhaps simplified things and said that there was only 3 of them, teachers at elementary level do that - say that there are 3 RNAs )
""""""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA

""""""Conservation of the "Ribosomal" universally binding site is used as. Argument 2 - for proving that ...... life started only once.
""""""Why? - because it is the same, the same DNA-code for that - in all cells we know of - hence. Life started only once, then diverged.


""""""Sorry but. Ribosomal domains is not my area. You have to read about it (them) yourself. Perhaps starting here.
""""""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribosome

I will end this post with the additional knowledge that.... [ This is obligatory to know, sacasm. ]

Energy, meaning energy the cells need - comes from the sun. And taken up by plants - in wather algies, ( by photosynthesis ). Then animals eat the plants and other animals eat those animals. ( Simplying a little here, since there are some termal energy from the core of the earth ).

🙂

P.S. [ Regarding the professor I mentioned before. ]

I know the name of said Professor. (Him I was referring to in my other post). I guess he no longer works at Uppsala University - since I can't find him in their "catalog of emploies". I guess I can ask someone where he works now but I don't see the point... You have to take my word on this one. ( No, correction ... "his words to me", we have word for that in Swedish ... if someone knows a the english term for ... then share it, please? ). His research area is: Using programming. To determine how birds eyes works. He is a professor in Zoo-ecology. And he studies the sight of birds.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
10 Oct 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

The problem with arguing with evilutionists is that they keep changing the definitions so you can't pin them down. That makes them as slippery as an eel.

The Instructor

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
10 Oct 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The problem with arguing with evilutionists is that they keep changing the definitions so you can't pin them down. That makes them as slippery as an eel.

The Instructor
Pots and kettles mister.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.