16 Jan 14
Originally posted by humyMicroevolution is nothing more than a new name that represents variation in species that result during breeding. It is really not evolution at all according to the theory of evolution, which is the idea that one kind of plant or animal can gain addition genetic information that will change it into another kind.Can you come up with a line of evidence that is reproducible when it comes to origins?
If you are talking about evolution, Yes. If not, what are you talking about?We don't see evolution because it takes too long.
FALSE: we have numerous examples of observed microevolution in recorded history. Since macroevolution ...[text shortened]... idence for it for it to be science. Read any of your previous posts on this and coma back to us.
17 Jan 14
Originally posted by humyI have not lost anything, except in the minds of you and your ilk.I'm talking about a working model that explains how the Universe came into existence
The same old creationist tactic: when you have lost the argument, just change the subject and hope nobody notices.
Sorry! That doesn't work on me!
I'm simply stating things as I see them.
19 Jan 14
Originally posted by EladarUnfortunately for you and all your creationist buddies, creationism is 100% wrong.
I have not lost anything, except in the minds of you and your ilk.
I'm simply stating things as I see them.
It totally amazes me how so many BILLIONS of people can be so thoroughly duped and that after 300 years of solid scientific results refuting such ancient fairy tales.
They should be relegated to boogie man status.
It goes to show you the intelligence level of the human race is not as high as they thought it was.
It is mind boggling to me creationists even capture scientists who should know full well creationism is a fairy tale.
19 Jan 14
Originally posted by sonhouseWhere can I find these 300 years of solid scientific results refuting creation. Everything I have seen refutes evilution.
Unfortunately for you and all your creationist buddies, creationism is 100% wrong.
It totally amazes me how so many BILLIONS of people can be so thoroughly duped and that after 300 years of solid scientific results refuting such ancient fairy tales.
They should be relegated to boogie man status.
It goes to show you the intelligence level of the h ...[text shortened]... o me creationists even capture scientists who should know full well creationism is a fairy tale.
19 Jan 14
Originally posted by RJHindsOf course everything YOU have seen 'refutes' evolution because the only thing you are CAPABLE of is watching opinion pieces based on bogus pseudoscientific babble. The real evidence is in the peer reviewed papers which you would never read for fear of getting tainted by your devils.
Where can I find these 300 years of solid scientific results refuting creation. Everything I have seen refutes evilution.
19 Jan 14
Originally posted by sonhouseYes, I've seen you spew your beliefs before. I know exactly what you believe on this subject.
Unfortunately for you and all your creationist buddies, creationism is 100% wrong.
It totally amazes me how so many BILLIONS of people can be so thoroughly duped and that after 300 years of solid scientific results refuting such ancient fairy tales.
They should be relegated to boogie man status.
It goes to show you the intelligence level of the h ...[text shortened]... o me creationists even capture scientists who should know full well creationism is a fairy tale.