09 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidSo now NASA is part of the conspiracy. This dude just said lately the sea level is going down. Does that mean he is contradicting his previous thesis sea level rise is due to eastern seaboard land mass sinking? Now it is rising again?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9sw_HfLejg
Where does he think the water from Antarcica's melting ice is going or the meltdown of Greenland?
This antiscience stance is clear when he dismisses the union of concerned scientists as a website just devoted to gathering money.
09 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidHere is a critique of your buddy Heller:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9sw_HfLejg
https://www.desmogblog.com/steven-goddard
10 Jun 19
@sonhouse saidNo, he said it is going up and down and it does. Stop making stuff up.
So now NASA is part of the conspiracy. This dude just said lately the sea level is going down. Does that mean he is contradicting his previous thesis sea level rise is due to eastern seaboard land mass sinking? Now it is rising again?
Where does he think the water from Antarcica's melting ice is going or the meltdown of Greenland?
This antiscience stance is clear when he dismisses the union of concerned scientists as a website just devoted to gathering money.
Don't you see what you are doing? You want him to be wrong so badly you are making up contradictions that do not exist. Sea level fluctuates up and down and some land masses sink into the ocean at the same time sea level is rising.
Notice how not all coastal cities have the same sea level rise. He explains why. Watch it again with an open mind and stop fighting it before the video ends. It makes perfect sense and you will realize that only if you let yourself. Stop getting overly emotional about it and be logical.
Also, I'm not interested in what your slander links have to say about skeptics. They have never come across a skeptic they had anything good to say about. Save it for group think.
11 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidThe thing is, you ONLY listen to skeptics on climate change. That is your whole life, proving the entire science world is wrong and your buddies like Singer are 100% correct and go home folks, nothing to see here, what will happen will happen and there is nothing mere humans can do to stop the oncoming disaster of major climate change, since humans did not cause it, humans cannot stop it.
No, he said it is going up and down and it does. Stop making stuff up.
Don't you see what you are doing? You want him to be wrong so badly you are making up contradictions that do not exist. Sea level fluctuates up and down and some land masses sink into the ocean at the same time sea level is rising.
Notice how not all coastal cities have the same sea level rise. He ...[text shortened]... They have never come across a skeptic they had anything good to say about. Save it for group think.
That is your bottom line.
11 Jun 19
@sonhouse saidThe thing is, you ONLY listen to alarmists on climate change.
The thing is, you ONLY listen to skeptics on climate change. That is your whole life, proving the entire science world is wrong and your buddies like Singer are 100% correct and go home folks, nothing to see here, what will happen will happen and there is nothing mere humans can do to stop the oncoming disaster of major climate change, since humans did not cause it, humans cannot stop it.
That is your bottom line.
The establishment wants your money so they embarked on a propaganda campaign started by Al Gore to scare you into supporting a carbon tax. Al Gore convinced a whole generation of leftists of a backwards cause and effect that you believed yourself. Instead of resenting him for lying to you it doesn't matter because liars are good in your opinion. You think it is fine to lie to people to get them to support a tax that hurts all of us financially, especially poor people.
You even demanded a peer reviewed article before you would believe your cause and effect was backwards. You fought the truth until you could not deny it anymore. Don't you resent Al Gore for it? Why do you embrace that liar instead of condemning him?
12 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidIf my money slows down climate change I am all for it. You can hide your head in the sand all you want but when the water rises to your sorry ass don't say you haven't been warned.
The thing is, you ONLY listen to alarmists on climate change.
The establishment wants your money so they embarked on a propaganda campaign started by Al Gore to scare you into supporting a carbon tax. Al Gore convinced a whole generation of leftists of a backwards cause and effect that you believed yourself. Instead of resenting him for lying to you it doesn't matter ...[text shortened]... it anymore. Don't you resent Al Gore for it? Why do you embrace that liar instead of condemning him?
12 Jun 19
@sonhouse saidIt worked, they scared you into wanting to give away your money. You do not even know what the money will be used for after they take it from you. Have you ever heard of an earmark? How about a lock box? That is one Al Gore idea that is never mentioned when discussing a carbon tax. We have petroleum wars to start and occupations are expensive. No lock box idea will be heard.
If my money slows down climate change I am all for it. You can hide your head in the sand all you want but when the water rises to your sorry ass don't say you haven't been warned.
Try writing your congressmen and suggest all carbon tax money be earmarked for renewable energy subsidies. They will pretend they are all for it then do nothing and say nothing. You will never hear about such a sensible idea on the corporate news media.
I live in northern lower Michigan near Gaylord. Do you really think the water will rise to my ass here in the hills of MI even if all glaciers melted like during the Pliocene? You are so silly.
Ask yourself why insurance companies insure homes in Florida. Are they selling flood insurance because they think they will lose money? Ask yourself why banks are lending money to mortgage homes in Florida. Would they do that if they thought ocean front property will be underwater soon? You need to pull your head out of the sand. Banks and insurance companies are not stupid. That is why they do not listen to alarmists like you.
19 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidThey will stop selling such insurance when Florida is underwarer, besides, they look at the big picture, they sell insurance in Boise Idaho and Alaska where they don't have floods and hurricanes so it averages out. They sell earthquake insurance because there are not that many earthquakes that destroy buildings.
It worked, they scared you into wanting to give away your money. You do not even know what the money will be used for after they take it from you. Have you ever heard of an earmark? How about a lock box? That is one Al Gore idea that is never mentioned when discussing a carbon tax. We have petroleum wars to start and occupations are expensive. No lock box idea will be hea ...[text shortened]... Banks and insurance companies are not stupid. That is why they do not listen to alarmists like you.
You can bet your bottom dollar they know what is happening to the odds of flooding in hurricane states and they probably see the increase there and you can bet your boopy they will increase rates as a result.
19 Jun 19
@sonhouse saidWhat about 30 year mortgages? Are banks reluctant to loan money to buy ocean front or even a below sea level condo in FL?
They will stop selling such insurance when Florida is underwarer, besides, they look at the big picture, they sell insurance in Boise Idaho and Alaska where they don't have floods and hurricanes so it averages out. They sell earthquake insurance because there are not that many earthquakes that destroy buildings.
You can bet your bottom dollar they know what is happening to ...[text shortened]... hey probably see the increase there and you can bet your boopy they will increase rates as a result.
Are you accusing them of being stupid?
19 Jun 19
1 edit
@metal-brain saidSince most high end businesses are Trumpites, I would say they totally ignore the possibility of climate change, go on home folks, nothing to see here.
What about 30 year mortgages? Are banks reluctant to loan money to buy ocean front or even a below sea level condo in FL?
Are you accusing them of being stupid?
And they will still make money for decades to come. Nobody says we are screwed 3 years from now, more like 100 years from now.
20 Jun 19
@sonhouse saidSo you acknowledge it would take at least 100 years?
Since most high end businesses are Trumpites, I would say they totally ignore the possibility of climate change, go on home folks, nothing to see here.
And they will still make money for decades to come. Nobody says we are screwed 3 years from now, more like 100 years from now.
20 Jun 19
2 edits
@metal-brain saidIt may or may not take that long before it gets too serious.
So you acknowledge it would take at least 100 years?
The point is, although it won't do so in, say, just 3 years time, it WILL eventually become too serious if the whole of humanity were hypothetically to moronically do nothing to prevent it; it would become just a matter of about when.
20 Jun 19
@humy saidDid you read that in your horrorscope?
It may or may not take that long before it gets too serious.
The point is, although it won't do so in, say, just 3 years time, it WILL eventually become too serious if the whole of humanity were hypothetically to moronically do nothing to prevent it; it would become just a matter of about when.
20 Jun 19
@metal-brain saidUnlike you, no. I just look at what the science and the experts say.
Did you read that in your horrorscope?