Go back
The age of the universe

The age of the universe

Science

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
30 Jun 23

@Metal-Brain
Whatever you say comrade. So how is your boss Putin doing these days anyway? Looks like his former cook is cooking Putin.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
30 Jun 23

It's rude to ask a universe its age. You gonna ask its weight next? How many partners it had?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
04 Jul 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester
They do it analyzing the light intensity of 'standard candles', stars that have very similar light intensity outputs so using the inverse square law, they see star A has X intensity, and star B has half the intensity so they can use that fact to calculate how far away the dimmer star is and how red the light gets as it is further away in space and of course in time. So they notice the stars further away also are redder, which is what doppler shift does so they know that star is further away both from the intensity reading and the doppler shift. Between the two, they figure out how far away stuff is and it turns out Hubble figured out the further away they are the redder the light but the kind of star it is shows it is the same physics as nearer ones so they can get the distance and age. I hope that helps.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
08 Jul 23

@sonhouse said
@divegeester
They do it analyzing the light intensity of 'standard candles', stars that have very similar light intensity outputs so using the inverse square law, they see star A has X intensity, and star B has half the intensity so they can use that fact to calculate how far away the dimmer star is and how red the light gets as it is further away in space and of course in ...[text shortened]... shows it is the same physics as nearer ones so they can get the distance and age. I hope that helps.
Thanks sonhouse, but I admit that I already knew this.

My point is that time is relative to a mass’ velocity and it’s proximity to other mass. These have been changing hugely since the Big Bang so measurements of times using observable bodies is not consistent and has never been consistent. We are measuring time from out own standpoint in an ever changing universe where tome itself is variable.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
09 Jul 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester
Cosmologists have just figure out time ran about 5 times slower in the early universe so there is that. Well, not THAT early, 1 billion years on.

https://www.space.com/quasar-clocks-universe-time-dilation

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
16 Jul 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

How old is our universe? New study says Big Bang might have happened 27 billion years ago

https://www.yahoo.com/news/old-universe-study-says-big-000030033.html

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.